You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there.
I had a question related to adding some time based dependency on the graph where we can have 2d convolution over multiple graphs differing in features/node. An approach taken is Spatio-Temporal GNN (STGNN) where they combine RNN + GCN. But they have more dynamic graphs (correct me if I'm wrong).
Is there a way to alleviate GNN formulation to compute 2d convolutions as well? I guess it should be straightforward, no? Instead of 1 adjacency matrix as input, we take in a batch and compute the convolution (eq. 7 of GCN paper) together. Would that not work?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there.
I had a question related to adding some time based dependency on the graph where we can have 2d convolution over multiple graphs differing in features/node. An approach taken is Spatio-Temporal GNN (STGNN) where they combine RNN + GCN. But they have more dynamic graphs (correct me if I'm wrong).
Is there a way to alleviate GNN formulation to compute 2d convolutions as well? I guess it should be straightforward, no? Instead of 1 adjacency matrix as input, we take in a batch and compute the convolution (eq. 7 of GCN paper) together. Would that not work?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: