-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade RPC Logic #100
Comments
Sure thing will catch it tomorrow Frontend
Backend
|
As in uAD.ubq.fi? I think there's an issue open for it you can handle that separately because I expect that to be its own big project. It's significantly more complicated codebase.
Don't think it's necessary for anything in production currently. Besides I can't think of where it's even being used. |
I already have a pull ready for it, if you can allow the build workflow I can abuse the preview deployment and try to reproduce, either way I can add the rpc-handler as part of that PR
No probs |
neither audit nor onboarding actually make use of any RPC calls reviewing the code, onboarding does lean into using the MM provider which the rpc-handler would have no effect on
|
The built in RPC sucks for speed. Let's use our custom ones if its for reading data on chain. |
I'm mistaken anyway there are two calls, decimals and approve, my bad Will pr it rn |
What could be replaced:
I'm unsure if it's worth it but that's the only reads that are happening, thought I'd ask before firing in a PR |
@Keyrxng heres a follow up |
Last PR open in |
@Keyrxng seems that it's the last step before closing this out? |
@Keyrxng the deadline is at 2024-07-16T03:43:14.940Z |
+ Evaluating results. Please wait... |
|
View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Issue | Task | 1 | 100 |
Issue | Comment | 7 | 0 |
Conversation Incentives
Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Sure thing will catch it tomorrow #### Frontend - onboarding - a… | 0content: p: count: 43 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.9 | - |
I already have a pull ready for it, if you can allow the build w… | 0content: p: count: 41 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.7 | - |
neither audit nor onboarding actually make use of any RPC calls … | 0content: p: count: 80 score: 1 code: count: 7 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.8 | - |
I'm mistaken anyway there are two calls, decimals and approve, m… | 0content: p: count: 16 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.5 | - |
- https://github.com/ubiquity/onboard.ubq.fi/blob/66b2bcbb3ca21f… | 0content: ul: count: 86 score: 1 li: count: 86 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.9 | - |
Last PR open in [`permit-generation` ](https://github.co… | 0content: p: count: 5 score: 1 a: count: 1 score: 1 code: count: 1 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.3 | - |
@0x4007 yeah just need this [PR](https://github.com/ubiquibot/pe… | 0content: p: count: 13 score: 1 a: count: 1 score: 1 wordValue: 0 formattingMultiplier: 0 | 0.2 | - |
[ 6.78 WXDAI ]
@0x4007
Contributions Overview
View | Contribution | Count | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
Issue | Specification | 1 | 4.4 |
Issue | Comment | 4 | 2.38 |
Conversation Incentives
Comment | Formatting | Relevance | Reward |
---|---|---|---|
@Keyrxng you think you can swap out the logic in the repos using… | 4.4content: p: count: 44 score: 1 em: count: 6 score: 0 wordValue: 0.1 formattingMultiplier: 1 | 1 | 4.4 |
As in uAD.ubq.fi? I think there's an issue open for it you can h… | 10content: p: count: 50 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1 | 0.2 | 2 |
The built in RPC sucks for speed. Let's use our custom ones if i… | 3.8content: p: count: 19 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1 | 0.1 | 0.38 |
@Keyrxng heres a follow up | 1content: p: count: 5 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1 | - | - |
@Keyrxng seems that it's the last step before closing this out? | 2.2content: p: count: 11 score: 1 wordValue: 0.2 formattingMultiplier: 1 | - | - |
@Keyrxng you think you can swap out the logic in the repos using the old version with your package? I'm not sure which all have it off hand but I assume onboard, audit, and pay have this logic.
Originally posted by @pavlovcik in ubiquity/rpc-handler#3 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: