Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stabilize workflow test env #229

Closed
Keyrxng opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 9 comments · Fixed by #230
Closed

Stabilize workflow test env #229

Keyrxng opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 9 comments · Fixed by #230

Comments

@Keyrxng
Copy link
Contributor

Keyrxng commented May 29, 2024

The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup issues

  • nonce too low
  • failed to fork using rpc for x, y or z

The current approach uses a yarn command stuffed with anvil cast ... CLI commands to fund which is the cause of the nonce too low issue and anvil.ts uses a single hardcoded RPC endpoint.

Time: 1hr

original context #204 (comment)

Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented May 29, 2024

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

Copy link

[ 6.225 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Specification 1 6.225
Review Comment 1 0
Conversation Incentives
Comment Formatting Relevance Reward
The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup i…
7.5
p:
  count: 68
  score: 1
code:
  count: 7
  score: 1
em:
  count: 3
  score: 0
0.83 6.225
Resolves #229 - added `rpc-handler` to pull a list of good RPCs…
0
p:
  count: 36
  score: 1
code:
  count: 1
  score: 1
0.905 -

Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented May 29, 2024

[ 18.4 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
ViewContributionCountReward
IssueSpecification118.4
Conversation Incentives
CommentFormattingRelevanceReward
The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup i...
18.4
h5:
  count: 1
  score: "1"
  words: 2
li:
  count: 2
  score: "2"
  words: 13
code:
  count: 3
  score: "3"
  words: 7
118.4

@rndquu rndquu reopened this May 29, 2024
Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented May 29, 2024

@Keyrxng the deadline is at 2024-05-29T08:27:10.846Z

@rndquu rndquu closed this as completed May 29, 2024
Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented May 29, 2024

+ Evaluating results. Please wait...

Copy link

[ 31 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Task 1 25
Issue Specification 1 6
Review Comment 1 0
Conversation Incentives
Comment Formatting Relevance Reward
The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup i…
7.5
p:
  count: 68
  score: 1
code:
  count: 7
  score: 1
em:
  count: 3
  score: 0
0.8 6
Resolves #229 - added `rpc-handler` to pull a list of good RPCs…
0
p:
  count: 36
  score: 1
code:
  count: 1
  score: 1
0.95 -

Copy link

ubiquibot bot commented May 29, 2024

[ 43.4 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview
ViewContributionCountReward
IssueSpecification118.4
IssueTask125
Conversation Incentives
CommentFormattingRelevanceReward
The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup i...
18.4
h5:
  count: 1
  score: "1"
  words: 2
li:
  count: 2
  score: "2"
  words: 13
code:
  count: 3
  score: "3"
  words: 7
118.4

@0x4007
Copy link
Member

0x4007 commented May 29, 2024

[ 31 WXDAI ]

@Keyrxng
Contributions Overview

View Contribution Count Reward
Issue Task 1 25
Issue Specification 1 6
Review Comment 1 0

Conversation Incentives

Comment Formatting Relevance Reward

The workflow tests have been seen to fail because of env setup i…

7.5
0.8 6

Resolves #229 - added rpc-handler to pull a list of good RPCs…

0
p:
count: 36
score: 1
code:
count: 1
score: 1
0.95 -

@gentlementlegen the scoring is very far off maybe you can look into making a matching config so that we know that everything is working as expected?

@gentlementlegen
Copy link
Member

gentlementlegen commented May 30, 2024

@0x4007 First issue I see is that the relevance should be 1 for the specification, and somehow the h5 is not listed. Other than that the configuration should have been quite the same. It is based on https://github.com/ubiquity/ubiquibot-config/blob/development/.github/ubiquibot-config.yml correct?

In the old bot I am not sure how to interpret the result being 18.4 with the given details. Also in the new bot, this is not the latest version I think because it doesn't display the applied multiplier for the user member status (collaborator member etc) which is supposed to be there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants