Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Search Adjustments #179

Open
0x4007 opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Search Adjustments #179

0x4007 opened this issue Dec 4, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@0x4007
Copy link
Member

0x4007 commented Dec 4, 2024

I was searching for https://devpool.directory/?search=top+up "top up" and its actually in the title of the task I was searching for. We need to increase the weight of the following:

  1. task title
  2. repository name
  3. organization name

I think it could be interesting to prefix special operators to hone in for example imagine typing @ubiquity/business-development and then the UI would understand that you want to search only in the scope of that repository. This can be a shorthand hack instead of changing the url to devpool.directory/ubiquity but it would also make it clear that we are searching within a repository. Otherwise I suppose we can see if the search begins with a / and then it can signal that you are targeting the repository.

In this case we can search /business-development and it would isolate the tasks from that repository.

In conclusion we should 1. increase the weight of matching task titles and 2. we should allow these fine grained search filters by parsing the symbols @ and / in the first character of the search.

@zugdev
Copy link
Collaborator

zugdev commented Dec 4, 2024

@0x4007 @gentlementlegen should we use pricing from development branch? I think main is down?

@0x4007
Copy link
Member Author

0x4007 commented Dec 4, 2024

This repo uses a different config so it must be wrong compared to our org configs.

@zugdev
Copy link
Collaborator

zugdev commented Dec 4, 2024

True, it looks like it's using old assistive pricing

@0x4007
Copy link
Member Author

0x4007 commented Dec 4, 2024

Feel free to open a pull to fix

@zugdev
Copy link
Collaborator

zugdev commented Dec 4, 2024

@0x4007 done in #182

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants