Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (37 loc) · 4.02 KB

kip-X.md

File metadata and controls

49 lines (37 loc) · 4.02 KB
Error in user YAML: (<unknown>): mapping values are not allowed in this context at line 3 column 152
---
kip: <to be assigned>
title: <KIP title>
author: <a list of the author's or authors' name(s) and/or username(s), or name(s) and email(s), e.g. (use with the parentheses or triangular brackets): FirstName LastName (@GitHubUsername), FirstName LastName <[email protected]>, FirstName (@GitHubUsername) and GitHubUsername (@GitHubUsername)>
discussions-to: <URL>
status: Draft
created: <date created on, in ISO 8601 (yyyy-mm-dd) format>
requires (*optional): <KIP number(s)>
replaces (*optional): <KIP number(s)>
---

This is the suggested template for new KIPs.

Note that a KIP number will be assigned by an editor. When opening a pull request to submit your KIP, please use an abbreviated title in the filename, kip-draft_title_abbrev.md.

The title should be 44 characters or less.

Simple Summary

If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough." Provide a simplified and layman-accessible explanation of the KIP.

Abstract

A short (~200 word) description of the technical issue being addressed.

Motivation

The motivation is critical for KIPs that want to change the Ethereum protocol. It should clearly explain why the existing protocol specification is inadequate to address the problem that the KIP solves. KIP submissions without sufficient motivation may be rejected outright.

Specification

The technical specification should describe the syntax and semantics of any new feature.

Rationale

The rationale fleshes out the specification by describing what motivated the design and why particular design decisions were made. It should describe alternate designs that were considered and related work, e.g. how the feature is supported in other languages. The rationale may also provide evidence of consensus within the community, and should discuss important objections or concerns raised during discussion.-->

Trade-offs and Risks

All KIPs must explain the various trade-offs and risks associated with the changes suggested

Implementation

While there is merit to the approach of reaching consensus on the specification and rationale before writing code, the principle of "rough consensus and running code" is still useful when it comes to resolving many discussions of API details.

Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via CC0.