Replies: 10 comments 7 replies
-
Thanks! Our primary focus at the moment is closely following the Farcaster Frames Specification. Since the Frames Spec is still new (launched on 1/26/24) and hasn't hit a stable v1 yet (current vNext), we don't want to introduce additional standards to Frog that might conflict with or diverge from what the Farcaster team and community has planned. In addition, the vast majority of Frame usage at the moment is via Warpcast (and Farcaster) so we want to make sure Frog serves that main audience first. As things mature, definitely down to explore other standards. Feel free follow up on this thread in the future or if anything major comes up you think is worth mentioning! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Throwing my proverbial hat in the ring of "please support the open frame spec". We plan on supporting frames via the OF spec. For context, we have a group chat app with 250k users or so who are not-yet-crypto-natives. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 for of compatibility. Or an option to add additional meta tags at least |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is an example of adding additional specs |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
After the first click, subsequent button navigation doesn’t work for Open Frames. It's because Frog is reading button values from the state and there is no state present for Open Frames. Solution would be to drive button values based on the indexes, not the state. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey there! wen open frames? 🐸🤝🖼️ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi - this is Bradley Freeman from the Stack.so team. I would also like to advocate for Frog compatibility with Open Frames. We just released a new feature, our Claim Frame, that uses Frog. Claim Frames enable users to distribute token rewards via a frame in 1 click. We have already received interest from teams that want to use Open Frames for this feature, but are blocked by lack of integration with Open Frames and Frog. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The middleware from @kuririn1 works great and is able to return the xmtp address. Im not able to add the of:accept:xmtp metadata Is this approach close to it?
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey all! thanks for your contributions and making this possible!. Frog has now added for XMTP and Open Frames thanks to tmm release 0.9.2 that adds support for custom header metadata. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
See #51 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi
Frog is pretty great, thanks for this!
I was wondering if it would be easy to support Open Frames https://github.com/open-frames/standard ?
It's a lightweight extension to the Frames spec to help other protocols adopt Frames and verified payloads (it would enable developers to have their Frame supported in Farcaster and, say, XMTP for instance).
I know Frames.js has support for it, would be great to see it in frog as well!
Let me know 🔥
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions