Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Volatile accuracy #9

Open
dominikhm opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Volatile accuracy #9

dominikhm opened this issue Feb 15, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@dominikhm
Copy link

Hi Will, first of all congratulations on all your success! Your work is great and inspiring and you really opened up a whole new realm of modeling possibilities for me (didn't know anything about ebms before).

Second of all, I'm currently exploring another EBM application based on your work in JEM and I was wondering whether you could help me understand a phenomenon. While running my model, I noticed that the training accuracy I calculate every few iterations sometimes decreases. When I noticed this I ran JEM again and realized it happened there too. Now the situations aren't comparable because that data is different but what is the intuition behind this? Is it bad? How can I work against it (change the no of steps in sgld, perhaps?). I usually noticed this in the first few epochs (also in JEM) - perhaps this changes (I'm quite impatient).

Another question I had was approximately at what epoch could you see that the samples you are generating were becoming something rather than just noise. I realize EBMs are volatile and take a long time but I'd just like to get an idea at what point can I say that this set up isn't working and I need to find new parameter settings

Thanks very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant