You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
boolean type coersion is inconsistent. A rule to detect this would be helpful.
Motivation:
Brightscript Debugger> a = invalid
Brightscript Debugger> if a: print "hi": end if
Type Mismatch. (runtime error &h18) in $LIVECOMPILE(8)
Brightscript Debugger> a = "true"
Brightscript Debugger> if a: print "hi": end if
Type Mismatch. (runtime error &h18) in $LIVECOMPILE(10)
Brightscript Debugger> a = true
Brightscript Debugger> if a: print "hi": end if
hi
Brightscript Debugger> a = 1
Brightscript Debugger> if a: print "hi": end if
hi
Improved style allows for invalid without crashes (though string vs. boolean still crashes)
Brightscript Debugger> a = invalid
Brightscript Debugger> if a = true: print "hi": end if
Brightscript Debugger> a = "true"
Brightscript Debugger> if a = true: print "hi": end if
Type Mismatch. (runtime error &h18) in $LIVECOMPILE(18)
Brightscript Debugger> a = 1
Brightscript Debugger> if a = true: print "hi": end if
hi
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looks like this is something we should check as part of the main parser. Similar to how we check for duplicate function definitions. With limited information - we might only be able to do this for some types.
boolean type coersion is inconsistent. A rule to detect this would be helpful.
Motivation:
Improved style allows for invalid without crashes (though string vs. boolean still crashes)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: