You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, sorry for bothering. I used validation set as test dataset by cd ../prepare && python3 fake_testing_set.py and tried to reproduce the paper evaluation results by running !cd ../judge && python3 classification_perf.py inception_v4
However, I got this
Performance for 店、路、车 are both 0.0%
And in the "cls_precision_by_model_size" file, I got this
The accuracy are all about 0.2
I also have read this issue #29 (comment) , but I did run your classsification/decide_cates.py without modification to generate cates.json. What reasons might it be for the performance I got?
Thanks for your help :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To use the pre-trained model, we should use the real train.jsonl and eval.jsonl, not the fake data generated by fake_testing_set.py .
You can run cp ../data/annotations/downloads/*.jsonl ../data/annotations/ and then python3 decide_cates.py. As a result, the top-10 categories in cates.json are
Hi, sorry for bothering. I used validation set as test dataset by
cd ../prepare && python3 fake_testing_set.py
and tried to reproduce the paper evaluation results by running!cd ../judge && python3 classification_perf.py inception_v4
However, I got this
Performance for 店、路、车 are both 0.0%
And in the "cls_precision_by_model_size" file, I got this
The accuracy are all about 0.2
I also have read this issue #29 (comment) , but I did run your
classsification/decide_cates.py
without modification to generate cates.json. What reasons might it be for the performance I got?Thanks for your help :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: