Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

some question about the pseudo label #8

Open
Beliefzp opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

some question about the pseudo label #8

Beliefzp opened this issue Apr 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Beliefzp
Copy link

Hello, I am very sorry to bother you again and again. I see a sentence in your paper which is "CAM and Grad-CAM were evaluated using the same ResNet38", so I have a question there: ResNet38 has many layers, such as 'bn7', 'bn6', 'bn5_2' and so on. I want to know which layer you use to extract the CAM and Grad-CAM.

Besides, I see the mIoU score of CAM based pseudo label is 70.44, and the mIoU score of Grad-CAM based pseudo label is 67.76. I am very confused that why the pseudo labels generated based on CAM and Grad-CAM are different. They use the same ResNet38 network so I guess the pseudo labels generated should be the same.

These are my two questions. There may be some unreasonable points. Please forgive me. Thank you very much.

@zhangst431
Copy link
Owner

We use the bn7 layer of ResNet38 to extract GradCAM. Additionally, CAM and GradCAM are two completely different methods, and naturally, the results they produce are not the same. You can read the papers of them, and you will find that the formulas used to calculate CAM and GradCAM are not the same.

@Beliefzp
Copy link
Author

I understand. Thank you very much for your reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants