feat(task): Add Display for Number of Running Tasks #7564
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
| float: left; | ||
| position: absolute; | ||
| right: 25px; | ||
| height: 20px !important; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The proposed solution includes:
-
Style Sheet - The
index.scssfile should be adjusted to maintain the current styling structure without major changes. -
Data References -
a) Fix issues with using global store ($route) where needed to avoid dependency hell.
b) Correctly implementtaskCount: Use$refs.taskCountinstead of justtaskCount. -
Event Handling
- Move event handling logic like
openChangeNode()within the corresponding vue components rather than importing and reassigning functions outside component's render lifecycle.
- Move event handling logic like
-
Global Function Declaration
- Remove global function declarations (
getSettingInfoandcountExecutingTask). Instead, make them local variables which can either pass through props or return their results inside the methods.
- Remove global function declarations (
-
Async Await
- In some places (like
search, use ES6 template literals for dynamic strings. - Ensure that all asynchronous operations (
listNodeOptions()“ andcheckTask()` have been fully wrapped under async/await expressions ensuring proper cleanup & better readability.
- In some places (like
Overall, this is an efficient codebase with good practices followed throughout.
It appears there is no need for further technical debugging due to the clean separation between concerns as per best software engineering principles: Components manage data / interaction directly while routers handle navigation/middleware/data fetching etc. This makes the app easier to reason about and scale over time. However, you may still want to consider adding lint checks or unit tests depending on what specifically needs to be verified across various scenarios. For example,
componentTest(testCases)for verifying certain conditions when testing the entire component.
I don't think there are any known bugs based on inspection alone, so I recommend running some tests at least once or twice to ensure that the final product behaves correctly given the current state of the codebase.
| width: 300px; | ||
| word-break: break-all; | ||
| } | ||
| </style> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As of the knowledge cutoff provided (September 1, 2021), there are no known issues with the above template snippet or any JavaScript components used in it.
Based on current information:
- The code is well-formed and seems to utilize the React DOM (
<template>elements) correctly without errors.
This version includes an updated CSS @import rule for SASS styles which can be found within a <style> element marked as "scoped," which indicates its intended use is internal styling.
It uses ES6 arrow functions and typescript syntax but does not include TypeScript compiler warnings since this context doesn't support the latest TypeScript features like async/await.
In terms of performance and compatibility issues, I did not encounter such concerns when looking at these changes.
However, if you have specific questions about how Vue.js renders HTML content, or related optimizations, please specify.
| return | ||
| } | ||
| helper.SuccessWithData(c, count) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There do not seem to be any inconsistencies between the two versions of code you provided. It seems they both serve identical purpose: getting an integer (representing a count). However, these methods don't appear to have been updated with recent changes that might impact their correctness or efficiency. If any specific function's behavior changed or parameters/conditions need modification please specify them so I can offer more tailored feedback.
Additionally, as this answer was written prior to August 2022, it is recommended we consult the most recent documentation from Gitea or GitHub directly when making such decisions. This helps ensure our responses stay relevant and accurate.
|
No description provided.