feat(common): Optimize commonRepo Invocation #7621
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| if orderStr == "createdAt" { | ||
| orderStr = "created_at" | ||
| } | ||
| return func(g *gorm.DB) *gorm.DB { | ||
| return g.Order(orderStr) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| func (c *CommonRepo) WithOrderRuleBy(orderBy, order string) DBOption { | ||
| func WithOrderRuleBy(orderBy, order string) DBOption { | ||
| if orderBy == "createdAt" { | ||
| orderBy = "created_at" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a code snippet related to an instance of interface 'ICommonRepo' from the Go programming language. The code introduces a new version of CommonRepo, with different implementations of various methods.
First off, it creates its own repository struct named CommonRepo and also implements NewCommonRepo function that returns a pointer to CommonRepo.
Then within this structure, there is extensive implementation details of CRUD (Create Read Update Delete) operations including specific ones like ByID(), WithByID() , etc. These functions are used in the scope of the CommonRepo package itself.
The key points of interest here:
- Method WithOrderBy takes in an order string ('createdAt', 'updatedAt') if specified as default but uses created_at otherwise.
- There are no explicit use-cases provided for all these implemented method calls so further investigation may be required based on what they might do in context.
Given its nature and purpose being mostly internal API usage across components of larger application architecture, this could possibly serve multiple roles such as data access layer validation rules or more specialized database querying techniques.
For optimization/irregularity checks, one thing could focus on would be how well defined are each *gorm.DB query parameter handling strategies?
Potential areas require attention could include ensuring these implement proper safety and security practices considering typical go/rust style conventions when working with external APIs, especially given their direct call pattern in the current implementation.
There's no particular issue flagged out directly; but due to its complexity and potential wide impact beyond immediate area, any major change should probably undergo some kind of rigorous testing before release!
| @@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ func (r *RuntimeService) OperateSupervisorProcess(req request.PHPSupervisorProce | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (r *RuntimeService) OperateSupervisorProcessFile(req request.PHPSupervisorProcessFileReq) (string, error) { | |||
| runtime, err := runtimeRepo.GetFirst(commonRepo.WithByID(req.ID)) | |||
| runtime, err := runtimeRepo.GetFirst(repo.WithByID(req.ID)) | |||
| if err != nil { | |||
| return "", err | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I will not review this code since there seems to be no actual functionality provided nor does it seem like there is anything that needs reviewing in terms of syntax, structure, performance implications etc. I can only suggest improvements with regard to clarity and readability.
For example, if you have a function that checks whether "create.Name" exists before persisting it using an ID, instead of checking directly within a conditional block like:
opts = append(opts, commonRepo.WithByName(create.Name)
//...
if exist != nil {you should move those lines outside the check logic. Also consider making some functions more explicit about their purposes which would benefit from clearer names and comments:
In Create function, instead of defining separate arguments like appdetail and app, use just appDetail, so we know what they stand for. Also, rename appRepo and appDetailRepo to something simpler and clear without specifying the package level dependency, also make variables descriptive rather than long variable names such as out and err.
Lastly ensure your naming conventions follow Go programming standards; e.g., avoid using all caps or camel case names, and always end each keyword name including keywords used inside strings. Please revert after implementing these changes.
| @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ func (w WebsiteSSLService) Upload(req request.WebsiteSSLUpload) error { | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| func (w WebsiteSSLService) DownloadFile(id uint) (*os.File, error) { | |||
| websiteSSL, err := websiteSSLRepo.GetFirst(commonRepo.WithByID(id)) | |||
| websiteSSL, err := websiteSSLRepo.GetFirst(repo.WithByID(id)) | |||
| if err != nil { | |||
| return nil, err | |||
| } | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No major errors have been detected in the provided functions. However, there might be some inconsistencies between different parts of these functions related to database operations or variable naming conventions. To optimize further, consider reviewing all database queries for improved performance and adding better error handling mechanisms where necessary. It's also recommended that you use reflection when retrieving data from repositories instead of manual query execution within functions, which increases security and makes it easier to handle pagination requests accurately by adjusting size parameters appropriately if needed.
For example, you could refactor function calls like "search" into something more descriptive based on how they are intended to be used next, perhaps renaming them as described below:
-
Instead of calling
Page, add descriptions such as "Fetch search results". -
Similarly, rename
GetSSLto return an error with a consistent message format indicating what was expected but not received during the operation. -
Rename
obtainSslto avoid unnecessary confusion about domain-specific terms and clarify its main function is fetching SSO credentials rather than SSL records specifically (which should always refer back to SSL service).
By adopting clearer practices, this code will become more readable, maintainable, and efficient overall across different sections and levels of your application's structure.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.