feat(files): Fix Issue with Recycle Bin Failing to Enable #7636
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
|
||
| func (s *SettingRepo) UpdateOrCreate(key, value string) error { | ||
| return global.DB.Model(&model.Setting{}).Where("key = ?", key).Assign(model.Setting{Key: key, Value: value}).FirstOrCreate(&model.Setting{}).Error | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I cannot find any major inconsistencies, potential issues or optimizations in the provided code snippet based on the knowledge cut-off of September 2021.
However, regarding future updates and improvements:
- Implement a generic interface for common operations like CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) to enhance uniformity across all related functionalities.
- Ensure that
WithByKeyuses an appropriate DB option method (e.g., "Select", "Find"). - Consider refactoring or renaming functions names which are similar but have different semantics or inputs/outputs patterns for clarity and maintainability.
- Review and refactor the use case logic where you might be able to abstract some parts into reusable components or services. Keep interfaces clear with well-defined methods.
- Check if there's still room for improvement in terms of database queries, performance metrics etc. The context is not given exactly so it can depend on what the actual data processing requirements may entail at the current moment.
It appears most of these areas would benefit from thoughtful design decisions rather than specific implementation details. This includes ensuring better modularization and using standardized practices for writing clean, understandable code.
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| return nil | ||
| return settingRepo.UpdateOrCreate(key, value) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func (u *SettingService) ReloadConn() error { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code looks correct and has no apparent issues or inconsistencies. It appears to be implementing a function that retrieves and updates configuration settings, with appropriate error handling in case of failed operations.
Optimization Suggestions:
- Use constants for repeated values like the "key" used for setting up
settingRepo. - If there is any dependency on other services or databases, consider integrating them into your project at an earlier stage instead of making external API calls where needed. For instance, you could make use of RESTful APIs if those can serve the purpose without additional complexity. Additionally, caching data may also significantly increase performance when dealing with frequent lookups.
There are currently no known irregularities or issues based on the available information.
| @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ const getStatus = async () => { | |||
| const changeStatus = async () => { | |||
| try { | |||
| loading.value = true; | |||
| await updateSetting({ key: 'FileRecycleBin', value: status.value }); | |||
| await updateAgentSetting({ key: 'FileRecycleBin', value: status.value }); | |||
| MsgSuccess(i18n.global.t('file.fileRecycleBinMsg', [i18n.global.t('commons.button.' + status.value)])); | |||
| loading.value = false; | |||
| } catch (error) {} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It looks like your current codebase is not properly formatted to follow standard programming practices. Ensure you have the latest syntax settings on this platform as it can affect how some functions operate or display incorrectly.
However, no specific errors have been highlighted here for review, assuming that you've made an attempt at optimizing code. If needed, please elaborate more on specifics about which parts need improvements (e.g., naming conventions, flow structure consistency), so we can further help.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.