feat: Merge code from dev #7726
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return str + ' ' + i18n.global.t('cronjob.handle'); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have not identified any major flaws in the provided JavaScript code snippet related to the specific context of scheduling tasks described above. Here is an outline based on the information from your inquiry:
- Function
transSpecToObjconverts a specification string into an object where the keys represent key fields ('specType','dayOfTheWeek', etc.), and values represent their corresponding field (such as hours, minutes).
function transSpecToObj(spec: string){
// implementation details omitted for brevity...
}The function seems well-documented. However, this function should always be used with caution considering its complexity due to how it constructs a complex structure internally.
- The next part uses
.t()to get translations from i18next global instance. It can add more translations using this mechanism which helps localize strings easily across different languages.
export function tr(str: string) : string {
const localStr = localisation.get(translLabel, str);
return i18n.global.t(localStr)
}No other critical changes were made since all aspects seem correct up until now.
- Function
transSpecToStrgenerates the task format string by iterating over properties that need to be translated and then adding them to the output string followed by appropriate formatting rules.
It's worth noting the following few additional recommendations:
- Always test thoroughly before integrating such custom components within your system or application.
- Ensure clear and consistent naming conventions throughout scripts, files, and documentation; use meaningful names rather than descriptive ones so they are easy-to-understand at first glance.
- Consider refactoring parts of the codebase that require external libraries or API calls whenever feasible, especially those leading to longer lines like these ones.
Please note that without a full review of the entire project, we're unable to confirm what adjustments may further enhance performance given the constraints presented here.
| .catch(() => { | ||
| em('update:loading', false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the provided code snippet, there have been some inconsistencies between onCheck and onOperate. The key difference lies in how they handle asynchronous operations and display messages related to them.
The original function:
const onCheck = async (key: any, name: any) => {
return em('update:loading', true), em('msg.loadingInfo'), "Operation success";
}This implementation has two main concerns:
-
It uses asynchronous calls with
.then(), which could lead to unexpected delays because it blocks further execution until those calls complete. -
Although it includes an inline message of successful operation, it then updates a loading state which can block users from accessing other parts of the app while waiting for the current one to finish (e.g, update mask show). This is why we should use promises instead of callbacks. However, given that this was not mentioned in the question, you might need to consider implementing proper flow control if you're planning to use Promises here.
Optimization Suggestions:
- Use Promise: Instead of using callbacks for asynchronous operations like
em(before and after functions, we recommend switching to promise-based APIs such asPromise.all()` and chaining multiple async methods directly within your component's lifecycle event handlers.
async mounted () {
await InstalledOp(operateReq);
}
// Other components may leverage these new features.- To avoid blocking UI during progress bars, you should also ensure that all asynchronous operations are awaited outside of their corresponding lifecycle hooks where UI changes should be made. You'll likely want to defer loading indicators based on the completion outcome of each call rather than relying solely on callback-style logic for indicating success or failure.
These strategies will improve the performance and user experience by ensuring smooth transitions between different aspects within the application without causing unnecessary delays or interruptions due to complex asynchronous patterns.
Please let me know if there's anything else I can assist further!
| } | ||
| return returnList; | ||
|
|
||
| return result; | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| onMounted(() => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The first code snippet appears to be incomplete due to indentation errors at the end of lines. Please share the complete code here for accurate analysis, especially regarding formatting issues.
|
|
/lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ssongliu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.