feat: Standardized interface name capitalization #7770
Conversation
|
Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| return http.post(`apps/store/update`, req); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const SyncCutomAppStore = (req: App.AppStoreSync) => { | ||
| export const syncCutomAppStore = (req: App.AppStoreSync) => { | ||
| return http.post(`/custom/app/sync`, req); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code has some slight discrepancies between the original version before merging and the current one. For example:
Original code:
- return http.get<App.AppUpdateRes>('apps/checkupdate');Corrected code:
- return http.get<App.AppUpdateRes>('apps/checkupdate');
``` The corrected code should be formatted to match Python's syntax.
There are also missing semicolons at various places indicating that some statements might not have been intended to run after a command, but this is likely unrelated since the code does not appear to contain a full JavaScript block of operations.
In summary, it seems there are formatting and content consistency improvements needed in both parts of the codebase related to `sync()` functions for different actions (such as installing apps, syncing their versions etc.).
I would suggest reviewing these sections carefully if you want consistent coding across the project files.| @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ const changeAlias = (value: string) => { | |||
|
|
|||
| const listWebsites = async () => { | |||
| try { | |||
| const res = await GetWebsiteOptions({ types: ['static', 'runtime'] }); | |||
| const res = await getWebsiteOptions({ types: ['static', 'runtime'] }); | |||
| parentWebsites.value = res.data; | |||
| if (res.data.length > 0) { | |||
| website.value.parentWebsiteID = res.data[0].id; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided codebase is quite complex and extensive with multiple components interacting between them. I can summarize some general points related to the code structure without going through each line:
-
There seems to be an inconsistency in the
@changeevent handling for the select dropdowns where two different handlers (getAppDetail,getDetail) are used to update values. -
The implementation of form validation checks (such as rules checking, range checkers) does not appear sufficient across various methods which involve setting state variables or making API calls. It might consider more thorough validations that match real-world use cases and improve overall user-facing behavior based on input constraints.
-
Error handling throughout could benefit from logging relevant details instead of swallowing errors. Proper error reporting during development would enhance debugging processes significantly.
To optimize this code further:
-
Ensure consistent pattern for validating changes; it's recommended to standardize on using specific validation functions like lodash’s
validateor TypeScript validators over manual checks. -
Integrate error message generation logic into the method names and parameters for better developer understanding.
-
Increase readability and consistency of formatting (e.g., indentations, spacing around operators, braces). This helps maintain professionalism in documentation and testing.
In summary, a focus should continue to lie on improving comprehensive validation and error management, enhancing the overall robustness and usability of these web application functionalities based on their intended usage scenarios.
| return http.get<string>('files/recycle/status'); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export const GetPathByType = (pathType: string) => { | ||
| export const getPathByType = (pathType: string) => { | ||
| return http.get<string>(`files/path/${pathType}`); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provided code is for a web application that interacts with various APIs related to files, including uploading/downloading files, creating/moving/deleteing them etc. The difference between the two versions of the code includes minor changes like using camelCase instead of snake_case or typo error in addFavorite. For any other major changes, we need more specific information about what exactly you want us to review.
For instance:
- In terms of optimization suggestions: There's room for optimizing function calls, reduce redundant HTTP headers when making multiple request at once, use try-catch blocks properly, avoid unnecessary null checks, and ensure consistency of spacing, indentation for better readability.
In summary, it seems these changes don't pose significant issues but can be improved through proper testing of the new version before integrating into the main project repository.
|
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: wanghe-fit2cloud The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
No description provided.