Targeted refresh #42
Targeted refresh #42
Conversation
![mentatai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/850097?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This review addresses several aspects of the code such as improving readability through careful use of control structures, ensuring compatibility with previous Python versions, and also suggests some improvements in documentation. Additional input validation is also recommended to make the code more robust.
Butler is in closed beta. Reply with feedback or to ask Butler to review other parts of the PR. Please give feedback with emoji reacts.
| @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ | |||
| from ragdaemon.utils import ( | |||
| DEFAULT_CODE_EXTENSIONS, | |||
| DEFAULT_COMPLETION_MODEL, | |||
| match_refresh, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider using a more idiomatic elif block instead of multiple separate if blocks for better readability and performance. Join conditions using elif where possible.
| async def annotate( | ||
| self, graph: KnowledgeGraph, db: Database, refresh: bool = False | ||
| self, graph: KnowledgeGraph, db: Database, refresh: str | bool = False |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using Union[str, bool] instead of str | bool might enhance compatibility with older versions of Python. Consider replacing str | bool with Union[str, bool].
| async def update(self, refresh=False): | ||
| """Iteratively build the knowledge graph""" | ||
| async def update(self, refresh: str | bool = False): | ||
| """Iteratively build the knowledge graph |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactoring suggestion: Extract the logic of matching refresh types to a separate method to improve the cohesion and maintainability of this method.
| @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ packages=["ragdaemon"] | |||
|
|
|||
| [project] | |||
| name = "ragdaemon" | |||
| version = "0.5.0" | |||
| version = "0.5.1" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the description of the project in pyproject.toml to provide more detailed information about what the project does and the specific features it offers.
| ) | ||
| return [] | ||
|
|
||
| async def chunk_document(self, document: str) -> list[dict[str, Any]]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function chunk_document lacks input validation. Ensure that the document format is correct and not empty before attempting to split and operate on the string to prevent runtime errors.
No description provided.