Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add new EPP for parsing ONT JSON reports #482

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024
Merged

Add new EPP for parsing ONT JSON reports #482

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

Karl-Svard
Copy link
Collaborator

Added

  • new EPP for parsing ONT JSONs
  • new optional flags for specifying root paths

Steps to consider while deploying

  • Configuration changes:
  • Documentation updates:
  • Inform users by email:

Review:

  • Code approved by
  • Tests executed on stage by: (Document the test done with screen shots and description.)
  • "Merge and deploy" approved by

This version is a:

  • MAJOR - when you make incompatible API changes
  • MINOR - when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner
  • PATCH - when you make backwards compatible bug fixes or documentation/instructions

idalindegaard
idalindegaard approved these changes Mar 25, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@idalindegaard idalindegaard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥🔥🔥

@Karl-Svard Karl-Svard merged commit 86d4e0f into master Mar 25, 2024
2 checks passed
@Karl-Svard Karl-Svard deleted the ont_json_parser branch March 25, 2024 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@idalindegaard idalindegaard idalindegaard approved these changes

@amandaraud amandaraud Awaiting requested review from amandaraud

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Karl-Svard @idalindegaard