Fix Content-Disposition header to handle UTF8 file names #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
L'UTF 8 fonctionne bien partout, sauf dans le header content disposition |
|
Je ferai bien 2 PR séparées :
|
amanteaux
reviewed
Jan 18, 2024
| @@ -97,8 +100,15 @@ public Response fetch( | |||
| if (attachment) { | |||
| String attachmentFilename = Optional.ofNullable(fileMetadata.getFileOriginalName()) | |||
| .orElse(fileMetadata.getUniqueName()); | |||
| String utf8FileName = URLEncoder.encode(attachmentFilename, StandardCharsets.UTF_8) | |||
| .replace("+", "%20"); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
J'avais pas vu cette ligne, comme on utilise déjà Guava, tu pourrais remplacer ça par UrlEscapers.urlFragmentEscaper().escape(attachmentFilename) ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
je vais essayer :)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6266
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5987#section-3.2