Bump ChunkSplitters to 3.0

[henry2004y]

ChunkSplitters.jl 3.0 introduces a breaking change to the chunks API, where n (the number of chunks) is now a keyword parameter.

[DanielVandH]

Thanks for this. I forgot there was a new release for that package. From https://github.com/JuliaFolds2/ChunkSplitters.jl/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md, I think instead the fix is to change chunks to index_chunks instead? chunks is a different function now apparently...

[henry2004y]

Thanks for this. I forgot there was a new release for that package. From https://github.com/JuliaFolds2/ChunkSplitters.jl/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md, I think instead the fix is to change chunks to index_chunks instead? chunks is a different function now apparently...

Yeah you are right, I forgot about that. Maybe in some places where the indices are not needed, we can simply use chunks. I just replace all chunks with index_chunks for now.

---

Hmm, I have no idea why the tests are failing. It seems that probably in some tests there are only one element with two threads?

[DanielVandH]

Do they fail with v2? You probably need to look at what index_chunks is actually giving for these vectors compared to v2's chunks

[henry2004y]

OK, I now understand the issue. We need to add enumerate as well as switching the order of indices and values. Actually the new way follows the natural argument order returned from enumerate, which is good. I didn't run the tests on my laptop because it took quite a while :)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.86%. Comparing base (1fb57cb) to head (403ebb4).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #40      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.86%   97.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          22       21       -1     
  Lines        1216     1215       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1190     1189       -1     
  Misses         26       26              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[DanielVandH]

Thanks for looking into this! I appreciate it. If you can remove the vscode settings file and bump the package version I'll merge and make a new release

[DanielVandH]

I didn't run the tests on my laptop because it took quite a while :)

And yeah they take a bit of time unfortunately, sorry about that.. probably longer than is needed but back when I was first developing the package it helped to be a bit exhaustive 😅

[DanielVandH]

New version has now been released. Thanks @henry2004y!