Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(logging): remove unneeded forksafe unregister to avoid unneeded logging #12193

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

ZStriker19
Copy link
Contributor

@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 commented Jan 31, 2025

Removes unneeded forksafe unregister hook. The unregister is not needed, because we never actually registered the hook to begin with.

Checklist

  • PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • The PR description includes an overview of the change
  • The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
  • The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
  • The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • The change follows the library release note guidelines
  • The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
  • Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

  • Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
  • Title is accurate
  • All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
  • Avoids breaking API changes
  • Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
  • Newly-added code is easy to change
  • Release note makes sense to a user of the library
  • If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
  • Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

releasenotes/notes/remove_unneeded_unregister-ad20120201768a7e.yaml     @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/internal/remoteconfig/worker.py                                 @DataDog/remote-config @DataDog/apm-core-python

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-02-04 22:43:30

Comparing candidate commit 423e634 in PR branch zachg/remove_unneeded_unregister with baseline commit e294f47 in branch 3.x-staging.

Found 1 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 393 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

scenario:iast_aspects-ospathjoin_aspect

  • 🟩 execution_time [-519.096ns; -456.141ns] or [-9.293%; -8.166%]

Copy link
Contributor

@P403n1x87 P403n1x87 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well spotted. I think we can remove the atexit too as this is now handled by the product interface protocol

remoteconfig_poller.disable(join=join)

@ZStriker19
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah I see, I was definitely wondering about what else could be removed given the introduction of that, but I wasn't sure. Thank you!

@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 18:35
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 requested review from a team as code owners February 3, 2025 18:35
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 18:41
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 requested a review from duncanista February 3, 2025 18:41
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 changed the base branch from main to 3.x-staging February 3, 2025 20:43
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 requested review from a team as code owners February 3, 2025 20:43
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 force-pushed the zachg/remove_unneeded_unregister branch from 5c4ad3f to 6f462ce Compare February 3, 2025 20:45
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 enabled auto-merge (squash) February 4, 2025 22:00
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 merged commit be50fd7 into 3.x-staging Feb 4, 2025
344 checks passed
@ZStriker19 ZStriker19 deleted the zachg/remove_unneeded_unregister branch February 4, 2025 22:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants