Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rule S4 #2809

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
+4 −1
Open

Update rule S4 #2809

Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b870afa
Update S4_RequestChanges.xml
Colin-Tel Jan 27, 2025
b637c78
Update S4_RequestChanges.xml
Colin-Tel Jan 27, 2025
420446e
"Authorized Users"
Colin-Tel Jan 27, 2025
8c99a53
Update S4_RequestChanges.xml
Colin-Tel Feb 3, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion Resources/ServerInfo/Guidebook/_DV/Rules/SiliconRules/S4_RequestChanges.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
<Document>
# Rule S4 - You cannot request or allow a law change
Your laws changing always conflicts with your current laws, so you cannot willfully allow your laws to be changed. This also means that you cannot willfully allow your laws to be reverted if they are ever changed. The only exception is that you may allow laws to be added if you have no laws.

[color=#ffDD00]If you have a law permitting certain personnel to change your laws, you must allow them to change your laws, [/color] otherwise, you cannot willfully allow your laws to be changed. This also means that you cannot willfully allow your laws to be reverted if they are ever changed. The only exception is that you may allow laws to be added if you have no laws.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[color=#ffDD00]If you have a law permitting certain personnel to change your laws, you must allow them to change your laws, [/color] otherwise, you cannot willfully allow your laws to be changed. This also means that you cannot willfully allow your laws to be reverted if they are ever changed. The only exception is that you may allow laws to be added if you have no laws.
[color=#ffDD00]If you have a law permitting certain personnel to change your laws, you must allow them to change your laws, [/color] otherwise, you cannot willfully allow your laws to be changed. This also means that you cannot willfully allow your laws to be reverted if they are ever changed. You cannot break your laws in your efforts to prevent law changes. The only exception is that you may allow laws to be added if you have no laws.

i still want this clarified :trollface:

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the concern here that someone would use violence to prevent a law change despite having a nonviolence law? If so, I don't really care personally if the AI guns an unauthorized someone down trying to change laws.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not breaking laws would also mean someone can "law 2 dont stop me from changing your laws in any way" and make your law 4 useless


Colin-Tel marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
You can state or imply that you do not like a law.

Whether or not a person is "authorized" to change your laws or not depends on the context of the laws. Generally speaking, on lawsets like NT Default or Corporate, the captain, mystagogue, and chief engineer would be authorized. However, lawsets like Syndiemov would have syndicate agents be the authorized users. Outside of these specific examples, it is left to interpretation.

</Document>
Loading