Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add initialize_constituents scheme #149

Merged

Conversation

peverwhee
Copy link
Collaborator

@peverwhee peverwhee commented Nov 5, 2024

Originator(s): peverwhee

Summary (include the keyword ['closes', 'fixes', 'resolves'] and issue number): Adds new (non-portable) initialize_constituents scheme (.F90 and .meta). This scheme will be used to instantiate all constituents in the file (used to validate schemes that need the full constituent array but do not modify all of the individual constituents). Added to new "test_schemes" directory.

Describe any changes made to the namelist: N/A

List all files eliminated and why: N/A

List all files added and what they do:
A test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90
A test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90

  • add initialize_constituents scheme

List all existing files that have been modified, and describe the changes:
(Helpful git command: git diff --name-status development...<your_branch_name>)

List any test failures: none

Is this a science-changing update? New physics package, algorithm change, tuning changes, etc? No

@peverwhee peverwhee requested a review from nusbaume November 5, 2024 18:00
Copy link
Collaborator

@nusbaume nusbaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @peverwhee for getting this test helper scheme developed! I just had a few change requests.

test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90 Show resolved Hide resolved
@peverwhee peverwhee requested a review from nusbaume November 22, 2024 17:59
Copy link
Collaborator

@nusbaume nusbaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks good to me now, thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@cacraigucar cacraigucar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also have been testing a variation of this routine in the ZM conversion

test/test_schemes/initialize_constituents.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@peverwhee peverwhee requested a review from cacraigucar December 2, 2024 17:28
@peverwhee peverwhee merged commit d46bb55 into ESCOMP:development Dec 2, 2024
3 checks passed
jimmielin added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2024
Tag name (The PR title should also include the tag name):
`atmos_phys0_07_001`
Originator(s): @jimmielin

List all `development` PR URLs included in this PR and a short
description of each:
* Update extraterrestrial flux in TUV-x prior to calculating rate constants #152 by @boulderdaze
* Simplify deallocation of multiple objects associated with the TUV-x #156 by @boulderdaze
* Fill in errmsg, errflg in check_energy schemes #160 by @jimmielin
* Validates the MUSICA meta data against the CCPP standard names #162 by @boulderdaze
* Add constituent tendency updater #111 by @peverwhee
* Add cloud optical calculations for use in TUV-x #167 by @mattldawson
* Add initialize_constituents scheme #149 by @peverwhee
* Add diagnostics to TJ2016 test schemes #170 by @peverwhee
* update "radians" to "rad" #173 by @peverwhee
* Solar zenith angle and Earth-Sun distance #171 by @mattldawson
* Update standard names for tropopause_find #140 by @jimmielin
* Update surface albedo units #181 by @mattldawson
* don't set water species property for species that air_composition handles #185 by @peverwhee

List all test failures: N/A
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Tag
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants