Oscillating mesh motion #1329
Oscillating mesh motion #1329
Conversation
|
needs a reg test. This should be useful for testing the overset solver, but more specifically, it's set up for the 2.5D OC7 cases. Pretty straightforward stuff. For thoroughness, here is what I am copying from (in the OC7 definition document).
|
mbkuhn
force-pushed
the
oscillating_mesh_motion
branch
from
84c87cf to
fbff59f
Compare
|
Looking good so far. I agree that it needs a regression test. How will the input work for this? I am not seeing links between it and our typical yaml input |
|
@wjhorne what kind of reg test would make sense? I am thinking it would be nalu-nalu overset, but is there a non-overset case that would make sense? |
|
I could be wrong, but I believe that there is not an option to do mesh motion via mesh distortion rather than overset unfortunately. This would mean we need an overset-overset case to get this through |
|
Sounds good. I'll try to set up a reg test today using the existing reg tests as templates. |
mbkuhn
force-pushed
the
oscillating_mesh_motion
branch
from
86649c4 to
bc0db33
Compare
|
@mbkuhn Not sure why this isn't merging given you set it to auto and I approved it. Is it due to a necessary rebase of the branch? I think we are good to go for a merge |
No description provided.