chore: Upgrade dependencies #185
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on updating dependency versions in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-45: Version constraint strategy looks well-structuredThe workspace uses a well-thought-out version constraint strategy:
- Main catalog: Specific minor/patch versions with appropriate flexibility
- Lax catalog: Major version only for maximum flexibility
- Min catalog: Multiple major versions where needed
This approach provides good balance between stability and flexibility.
Consider documenting the version constraint strategy in the repository's documentation to help maintainers understand the reasoning behind different catalog sections.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pnpm-workspace.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pnpm-workspace.yaml (3)
7-7: LGTM! Minor version bump and formatting improvement
The Starlight update is a patch version bump, and the quote removal in the lax catalog improves consistency.
Also applies to: 37-37
2-3: Verify compatibility between Astro and Integration Kit versions
The version updates look reasonable, but let's verify the compatibility between Astro 5.1.1 and astro-integration-kit 0.18.0.
✅ Verification successful
Version updates are compatible and widely used in the ecosystem
Based on the analysis of the codebase:
- The version updates (Astro 5.1.1 and astro-integration-kit 0.18.0) are being used together in multiple examples and packages
- The integration kit is properly integrated as a peer dependency with compatible version ranges
- Several packages in the workspace are already using these versions together successfully
- The version constraints (^ for Astro and ~ for integration kit) are appropriate for maintaining stability while allowing patches
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any compatibility issues or breaking changes
# Check the changelog/releases for astro-integration-kit
gh api repos/withastro/astro-integration-kit/releases -q '.[].body' | grep -i "breaking\|compatibility"
# Check if these versions are commonly used together
rg -g "package*.json" -g "pnpm*.yaml" "astro.*5\.1\.1.*astro-integration-kit.*0\.18\.0"
Length of output: 220
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify compatibility
# Check if there are any specific version requirements or constraints in the codebase
rg -g "package*.json" -g "pnpm*.yaml" "\"astro\":|astro:|\"astro-integration-kit\":|astro-integration-kit:" -A 1 -B 1
# Look for any integration kit specific configuration or usage
rg -g "*.{js,ts,mjs,cjs}" "astro-integration-kit"
# Check for any potential integration setup files
fd "astro.config" --extension js --extension mjs --extension ts
Length of output: 29027
29-32: Verify Vite v6.0.6 stability with the current setup
The Vite update is a patch version bump within v6. Since Vite v6 is relatively new, let's verify its stability with the current setup.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the Vite setup and its integration.
Vite v6.0.6 update appears safe for the current setup
The verification shows that:
- The project uses a straightforward Vite setup with minimal configuration
- Vite is used in examples with basic build/dev scripts
- The plugins used are internal to the project and follow a simple pattern
- The lockfile shows all dependencies are properly resolved with Vite 6.0.6
- No issues related to Vite v6 were found in the repository
The patch version bump from 6.0.3 to 6.0.6 is safe to proceed with, as:
- The project's Vite usage is minimal and follows standard patterns
- The configuration is simple and doesn't use advanced features
- All dependencies support Vite v6 as shown in the lockfile
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any reported issues with Vite v6
# Check for any Vite-related issues in the repository
gh issue list --search "vite v6 in:title,body" --state all
# Check for Vite version constraints in project files
rg -g "package*.json" -g "pnpm*.yaml" "vite.*6\.0\.[0-9]+"
Length of output: 1746
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for Vite configuration files and their content
fd "vite.config" --exec cat {}
# Check for any build or dev scripts in package.json files that use Vite
rg -g "package*.json" "\"(build|dev)\".*vite" -A 1
# Check for any Vite plugins or specific configurations
rg -g "vite.config*" "plugins|optimizeDeps|build"
Length of output: 963
Summary by CodeRabbit