Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite CoAL recipe loader #3837

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025
Merged

Rewrite CoAL recipe loader #3837

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 25, 2025

Conversation

serenibyss
Copy link
Member

Rewrites the CoAL recipe loader to be done by hand. Recipes are exactly identical to before aside from one difference, where the LuV Conveyor had no CoAL recipe with Styrene Butadiene Rubber, which it now does (this was an autogen failure).

Enables us to much more easily edit these recipes going forward, and have more granular control over individual recipes vs hacking apart a complex piece of autogen. Also removes another loop over a recipe map getAllRecipes() call.

Lastly this introduces an ore prefix for circuit wraps, so these have oredicts now. This is mostly for convenience in coding, but maybe someone will find a use for this.

@serenibyss serenibyss requested a review from a team January 20, 2025 21:08
@serenibyss serenibyss added refactor For PRs rewritting a part of the code to have a nicer code overall. 🚧 Testing on Zeta Do not merge yet, testing this PR on Zeta labels Jan 20, 2025
@serenibyss serenibyss enabled auto-merge (squash) January 25, 2025 16:08
@serenibyss serenibyss removed the 🚧 Testing on Zeta Do not merge yet, testing this PR on Zeta label Jan 25, 2025
@serenibyss serenibyss merged commit dbb4bc5 into master Jan 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@serenibyss serenibyss deleted the coal-recipe-loader-rewrite branch January 25, 2025 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor For PRs rewritting a part of the code to have a nicer code overall.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants