Erm.... No More Foreigner Trait Head Roles!!!!!

[SixplyDev]

Description

This PR prevents heads of staff and security members from having foreigner traits, muted trait, blindness trait, and pacifist trait (only HoS & Cap cannot be pacifist). These traits are major disabilities and actively detrimental to their departments & the rest of command staff if they have them. These traits make them unable to clearly and effectively communicate or render them unable to do a critical part of their jobs in the case of pacifist and muted.

---

TODO

• Security Department can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• Head of Security can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• Heads of staff can no longer have muted, blind, or foreigner traits.
• The Captain can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• Head of Personnel can no longer have muted, blind, or foreigner traits.

---

Changelog

🆑 ShirouAjisai

• tweak: Security Department can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• tweak: Head of Security can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• tweak: Heads of staff can no longer have muted, blind, or foreigner traits.
• tweak: The Captain can no longer have pacifist, muted, blind, brittle bone disease, or foreigner traits.
• tweak: The Head of Personnel can no longer have muted, blind, or foreigner traits.

[CerberusWolfie]

Pacifism should not exist on select Head of Staff. They do not necessarily need to defend themselves with lethality. Captain and HoS make sense.

[CerberusWolfie]

This is an issue, this should be fixed.

[CerberusWolfie]

Security is fine, and if you address the Head of Security typo, then the entire Security department would be fine to push.

[CerberusWolfie]

You can mark the security typo as resolved.

[SixplyDev]

All issues resolved

[SixplyDev]

Description updated to inclue new changes

[CerberusWolfie]

I would be fine with limiting Foreigner in Command Positions. I don't particularly like it, since batteries exist.

[CerberusWolfie]

Take away Foreigner and Foreigner Light requirements. I don't see these as impeding anything.

[SixplyDev]

I'm standing firm on my decision to keep foreigner & foreigner light there. They impede effective communication with your team which is essential. Additionally, it makes no sense for a company like Nanotrasen to hire managers who can't even speak the common language of the company or the majority of its employees.

[CerberusWolfie]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

[SixplyDev]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

Respectfully, security is the one job section aside from command where not having foreigner is an absolute MUST

[CerberusWolfie]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

Respectfully, security is the one job section aside from command where not having foreigner is an absolute MUST

I don't agree. Security having a translator is not inherently a bad concept. The only downside to translators is losing power during critical moments, but a good player would be able to prepare for this.

[SixplyDev]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

Respectfully, security is the one job section aside from command where not having foreigner is an absolute MUST

I don't agree. Security having a translator is not inherently a bad concept. The only downside to translators is losing power during critical moments, but a good player would be able to prepare for this.

Security should be able to effectively do their job without the assistance of technology and in any environment. Once we have shoves fully added in when we merge with upstream, it'll be a reality.

[CerberusWolfie]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

Respectfully, security is the one job section aside from command where not having foreigner is an absolute MUST

I don't agree. Security having a translator is not inherently a bad concept. The only downside to translators is losing power during critical moments, but a good player would be able to prepare for this.

Security should be able to effectively do their job without the assistance of technology and in any environment. Once we have shoves fully added in when we merge with upstream, it'll be a reality.

Except you don't need the translator in your hand to use it. So this point is pretty null.

[SixplyDev]

I don't like Foreigner being disabled, same as above comments.

Respectfully, security is the one job section aside from command where not having foreigner is an absolute MUST

I don't agree. Security having a translator is not inherently a bad concept. The only downside to translators is losing power during critical moments, but a good player would be able to prepare for this.

Security should be able to effectively do their job without the assistance of technology and in any environment. Once we have shoves fully added in when we merge with upstream, it'll be a reality.

Except you don't need the translator in your hand to use it. So this point is pretty null.

The point was that you should be able to do your job effectively without the use of technology. Communicating clearly and effectively is part of your job as a security officer

[CerberusWolfie]

I've talked to some others and gotten more information regarding this. I'll accept Foreigner being removed from Command and Security. NanoTrasen would not care and would not promote people to that position.