Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
opposite rings #1940
opposite rings #1940
Changes from 4 commits
b0c83eb
bf73db5
7cf29dc
a7a07aa
42f43aa
5a5f22a
b76f725
828ebe5
0841755
57d4f02
448539a
53e4cda
2388bc6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we have
mult_assoc_opp
take its arguments in the reverse order, then lines 428 and 433 will become simpler, and sorng_op
will be slightly smaller. Probably worth it. For Is1Cat too.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same for the distributivity laws (which also comes up in my last commit, where I needed a
fun x y => ...
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've changed
mult_assoc_opp
like you've suggested but I don't think its worth touching the distributivity laws in general. Your specific case isn't actually using the mathclasses distributivity but the ring law version.However changing the order of those arguments will be confusing during use. The opp field isn't supposed to actually be used by anybody anyway.