Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 7, 2022. It is now read-only.

[WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method #9439

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ganeshhubale
Copy link
Member

Purpose or Intent

  • Testing embedded playbook with retry method

PRT Run

{{ pytest: cfme/tests/ansible/test_embedded_ansible_automate.py::test_embed_tower_playbook_with_retry_method -vvvv --long-running}}

    - Testing embedded playbook with retry method
@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale changed the title [WIP]New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method [WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method Oct 3, 2019
@dajoRH
Copy link
Contributor

dajoRH commented Oct 3, 2019

I detected some fixture changes in commit 57476c2

The local fixture set_repo is used in the following files:

  • cfme/tests/ansible/test_embedded_ansible_automate.py
    • test_embed_tower_playbook_with_retry_method

Please, consider creating a PRT run to make sure your fixture changes do not break existing usage 😃

@dajoRH
Copy link
Contributor

dajoRH commented Oct 11, 2019

Would you mind rebasing this Pull Request against latest master, please? :trollface:
CFME QE Bot

@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale changed the title [WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method [WIPTEST] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method Feb 5, 2020
@dajoRH dajoRH changed the title [WIPTEST] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method [WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method Feb 5, 2020
@ganeshhubale ganeshhubale changed the title [WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method [WIPTEST] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method Feb 5, 2020
@dajoRH dajoRH changed the title [WIPTEST] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method [WIP] New Test: Testing playbooks with retry method Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants