Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge Section Template - Meeds-io/MIPs#172 - Dev-Meed #281

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

boubaker
Copy link
Member

@boubaker boubaker commented Jan 9, 2025

No description provided.

…s#172 (#271)

This change will initialize the Section Template API and portlet
skeleton.
#273)

This change will inject the default Dynamic and Fixed sections.
…MIPs#172 (#274)

This change will reuse the Layout editor in a new application dedicated
for Section Template edition.
 (#276)

This change will allow to chose a section template switch customized
templates added by an administrator.
…/MIPs#172 (#279)

Prior to this change, the section templates drawer wasn't allowing to be
expanded. This change allows to expand the section templates cards to be
displayed in a row when the drawer gets expanded.
@boubaker boubaker changed the base branch from feature/whitepaper to develop-meed January 9, 2025 17:45
@boubaker boubaker enabled auto-merge (rebase) January 9, 2025 17:45
…eeds-io/MIPs#172 (#280)

This change will move Section Buttons to top-right of the container
instead of center-right.
@boubaker boubaker force-pushed the meed-mip-172-dev-meed branch from bf67cf0 to 370c970 Compare January 9, 2025 18:05
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
59.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@boubaker boubaker merged commit 94ec08f into develop-meed Jan 9, 2025
3 of 4 checks passed
@boubaker boubaker deleted the meed-mip-172-dev-meed branch January 9, 2025 18:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants