fix: remove goerli infura from network state

[salimtb]

Description

core PR: MetaMask/core#5094

Related issues

Fixes: #12837

Manual testing steps

1. Run the app locally
2. you should not see the verbose logs , or any request sent to Goerli

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

• I’ve followed MetaMask Contributor Docs and MetaMask Mobile Coding Standards.
• I've completed the PR template to the best of my ability
• I’ve included tests if applicable
• I’ve documented my code using JSDoc format if applicable
• I’ve applied the right labels on the PR (see labeling guidelines). Not required for external contributors.

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

• I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
• I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

[github-actions]

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

[github-actions]

Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 709d653
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/85ad3de4-6edd-435e-abc3-ce545dc39690

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

• Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

[github-actions]

Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 51a142d
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/9c05f462-f0b3-48b3-9ab6-4d7fc8eab6a0

Note

• You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
93.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[NicolasMassart]

Looks good to me.