Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: revert NFT grid view #13292

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

fix: revert NFT grid view #13292

merged 16 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

sahar-fehri
Copy link
Contributor

Description

PR to revert #12983

We have seen issues on Android while trying to render a large list of NFTs and the app eventually crashes with err
You have a large list that is slow to update - make sure your renderItem function renders components that follow React performance best practices like PureComponent, shouldComponentUpdate

reverting this PR for now

Related issues

Fixes:

Manual testing steps

  1. Go to this page...

Screenshots/Recordings

Before

After

Pre-merge author checklist

Pre-merge reviewer checklist

  • I've manually tested the PR (e.g. pull and build branch, run the app, test code being changed).
  • I confirm that this PR addresses all acceptance criteria described in the ticket it closes and includes the necessary testing evidence such as recordings and or screenshots.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

CLA Signature Action: All authors have signed the CLA. You may need to manually re-run the blocking PR check if it doesn't pass in a few minutes.

@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri added needs-assets-ux-review A shared label between the Assets and UX team to flag PRs ready for consolidated team review. Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise labels Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 31, 2025

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 8357973
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/841cb29e-8358-414a-8700-abe5ef69ca2f

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

  • Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri marked this pull request as ready for review January 31, 2025 13:07
@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri requested review from a team as code owners January 31, 2025 13:07
@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri added Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise and removed Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise labels Feb 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: 815f79d
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/5b362986-e6b0-46b5-9fb4-73680044c9a7

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

  • Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri added Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise and removed Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise labels Feb 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

❌❌❌ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline failed on Bitrise! ❌❌❌

Commit hash: e0231ad
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/362629f3-eced-4c3f-a61b-90abd79eaf83

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Tip

  • Check the documentation if you have any doubts on how to understand the failure on bitrise

@darkwing darkwing added the skip-sonar-cloud Only used for bypassing sonar cloud when failures are not relevant to the changes. label Feb 4, 2025
@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri added Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise and removed Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise labels Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

https://bitrise.io/ Bitrise

✅✅✅ pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline passed on Bitrise! ✅✅✅

Commit hash: 9b57587
Build link: https://app.bitrise.io/app/be69d4368ee7e86d/pipelines/aecc8ee8-4c30-4610-904b-040e31acd80d

Note

  • You can kick off another pr_smoke_e2e_pipeline on Bitrise by removing and re-applying the Run Smoke E2E label on the pull request

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
74.8% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@sahar-fehri sahar-fehri added Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise and removed Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise labels Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sethkfman sethkfman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@darkwing
Copy link
Contributor

darkwing commented Feb 4, 2025

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@darkwing darkwing added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit c7c8ecf Feb 4, 2025
46 of 47 checks passed
@darkwing darkwing deleted the fix/revert-nft-grid branch February 4, 2025 20:36
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 4, 2025
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the release-7.41.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.41.0 label Feb 4, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
needs-assets-ux-review A shared label between the Assets and UX team to flag PRs ready for consolidated team review. release-7.41.0 Issue or pull request that will be included in release 7.41.0 Run Smoke E2E Triggers smoke e2e on Bitrise skip-sonar-cloud Only used for bypassing sonar cloud when failures are not relevant to the changes. team-assets
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants