-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 155
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update RRFS regression test cases #750
Conversation
The new RRFS case has the same configuration as RRFS_A warm cycles. 2) delete case netcdf_fv3_regional 3) add RRFS EnKF case: rrfs_enkf_conv
run with both GFS and FV3REG on. Need to update EnKF code to enable it run with both at the same time.
@hu5970 I finished my first round of reviewing (:)) . I added a couple of general comments for consideration. |
@TingLei-NOAA I do not have good method on how to test new added regression test cases. Only thing I can think of is to check output from the case to make sure the case look good based on the past experience. |
@hu5970 Could you please start your regression test to ensure there is no impact of these changes on global and HAFS? |
Got regression test done on Hera:
The regression test is done on Dogwood:
Test on Hercules:
Repeat failed case and it passed:
|
To run EnKF for RRFS case, please change ENKF_MODE in The regression test with RRFS regional EnKF on Hera is:
Test on Hercules:
|
Description
The new RRFS case has the same configuration as RRFS_A warm cycles.
This PR depends on GSI-fix PR: NOAA-EMC/GSI-fix#20
This pull request is addressing Fix #586
Please copy the data for the new cases:
Hera: "/scratch1/BMC/wrfruc/mhu/code/data"
Cactus:"/lfs/h2/emc/ptmp/Ming.Hu/data"
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Those two new cases were tested on Hera and WCOSS2 (Cactus)
Checklist