Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

debug #3

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

debug #3

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Jan 6, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added manual workflow dispatch capability to the release workflow
    • Increased flexibility for triggering GitHub Actions workflow manually

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@JarbasAl has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 50 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 92b85fc and 4f9fec4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • setup.py (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new manual trigger (workflow_dispatch) to the GitHub Actions release workflow. This modification allows the workflow to be manually initiated in addition to its existing automatic trigger when pull requests are closed on the dev branch. The change provides more flexibility in workflow execution while maintaining the existing job logic and dependencies.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/release_workflow.yml Added workflow_dispatch event trigger to enable manual workflow execution

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's release workflow tale,
With manual magic beyond the trail,
Click and trigger, workflow takes flight,
Dispatch at will, with pure delight!
Flexibility hops into the scene 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/workflows/release_workflow.yml (1)

Line range hint 22-32: Update Matrix notification for manual triggers

The Matrix notification message assumes PR context which won't be available with manual triggers.

Consider conditionally formatting the message:

  message: |
+   ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && format('Manual release triggered for {0}', github.repository) || format('new {0} PR merged! https://github.com/{1}/pull/{2}', github.event.repository.name, github.repository, github.event.number) }}
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/release_workflow.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-100: Consider adding input parameters for manual triggers

Since this is for debugging purposes, it would be helpful to add workflow inputs to control behavior when manually triggered.

Add parameters to customize the workflow:

on:
  workflow_dispatch:
    inputs:
      dry_run:
        description: 'Run in dry-run mode (skip PyPI publish)'
        type: boolean
        default: true
      target_branch:
        description: 'Target branch for release'
        type: string
        default: 'dev'

Then use these inputs to control job execution:

  publish_pypi:
    if: |
      (github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && !inputs.dry_run) ||
      (github.event_name == 'pull_request' && github.event.pull_request.merged == true)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4895821 and 92b85fc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release_workflow.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/release_workflow.yml (1)

Line range hint 34-52: Verify PyPI publishing security

The PyPI publishing step could now be triggered manually, which requires extra caution.

Run this script to check recent workflow runs and ensure proper access controls:

✅ Verification successful

PyPI publishing security measures are adequate

The workflow has proper security controls:

  • Only triggers on merged PRs to dev branch or manual dispatch
  • Requires successful completion of publish_alpha job
  • Uses official PyPI publishing action with secure token authentication
  • Creates a release PR for human review before master updates
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check workflow permissions and recent manual triggers
gh api repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/actions/workflows -q '.workflows[] | select(.path == ".github/workflows/release_workflow.yml") | .state, .url'

# List users with workflow write permissions
gh api repos/$GITHUB_REPOSITORY/collaborators -q '.[] | select(.permissions.workflows == true) | .login'

Length of output: 443


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete workflow file content
cat .github/workflows/release_workflow.yml

# Search for other workflow files that might trigger this one
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/

# Look for environment configurations
rg -l "environment:" .github/workflows/

Length of output: 3793

.github/workflows/release_workflow.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JarbasAl JarbasAl added the fix label Jan 6, 2025
@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit 7c20f16 into dev Jan 6, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the dbg branch January 6, 2025 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant