Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ansible/sound] Closes #238 #239

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025
Merged

[ansible/sound] Closes #238 #239

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

goldyfruit
Copy link
Member

@goldyfruit goldyfruit commented Jan 11, 2025

Cause by https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/61060/files
Introduced by ad05dc6

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated task processing method for sound server initialization to use dynamic task inclusion.

@goldyfruit goldyfruit added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 11, 2025
@goldyfruit goldyfruit added this to the Commander Keen milestone Jan 11, 2025
@goldyfruit goldyfruit self-assigned this Jan 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Ansible handler for starting the sound server in the OVOS installer role. The primary change involves switching from ansible.builtin.import_tasks to ansible.builtin.include_tasks for processing the block-sound.yml file. This modification alters the task inclusion mechanism, allowing for more dynamic task processing at runtime instead of static inclusion during playbook parsing.

Changes

File Change Summary
ansible/roles/ovos_installer/handlers/main.yml Replaced ansible.builtin.import_tasks with ansible.builtin.include_tasks for block-sound.yml task inclusion

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A handler's dance, tasks now light and free,
Dynamically spinning, a code melody
From static to fluid, our sound server leaps
With include_tasks, Ansible softly creeps
A rabbit's playbook, now nimbler than before! 🎵


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
ansible/roles/ovos_installer/handlers/main.yml (1)

Line range hint 1-20: Consider documenting the handler sequence dependencies

The handlers form a critical sequence for sound system initialization. Consider adding comments to document any specific order dependencies between these handlers, especially since the sound server startup is now using dynamic inclusion.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fdf0d1 and 408c030.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • ansible/roles/ovos_installer/handlers/main.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
ansible/roles/ovos_installer/handlers/main.yml (1)

3-3: LGTM! The change to include_tasks addresses the Ansible compatibility issue.

This modification aligns with Ansible's task processing changes and provides better runtime flexibility for the sound server startup sequence.

Let's verify if there are any other similar patterns that might need updating:

✅ Verification successful

No changes needed for other import_tasks instances

The change from import_tasks to include_tasks was specifically needed for handlers due to ansible/ansible#61060. The other import_tasks instances found are in regular task files where static imports are preferred and not affected by this issue.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other potential import_tasks that might need similar updates
# Look for other import_tasks usage that might need similar updates
rg "import_tasks:" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 11349

@goldyfruit goldyfruit merged commit 16047c8 into main Jan 11, 2025
7 of 9 checks passed
@goldyfruit goldyfruit deleted the fix/handler_include branch January 11, 2025 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant