-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix rendering and parsing #65
Conversation
Update version, root, and run command, build fresh docs, and add tui
… move everything into run command
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces multiple changes, including the addition of a new GitHub Actions job named Changes
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@RoseSecurity has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (22)
main.go (1)
3-3
: Add missing importsIf you apply the suggested error handling fix, you'll need to add the
os
package to imports.import ( "github.com/RoseSecurity/terramaid/cmd" + "os" )
test/multi/outputs.tf (1)
1-4
: Consider enhancing the output for testing purposesSince this is part of a test configuration, consider adding additional metadata to make testing more robust.
output "ubuntu_ami" { value = data.aws_ami.ubuntu.id - description = "Ubuntu AWS AMI ID" + description = "Ubuntu AWS AMI ID used for testing" + sensitive = false }This change:
- Clarifies that this output is for testing purposes
- Explicitly sets
sensitive = false
to ensure the value is visible in test outputstest/multi/variables.tf (1)
1-5
: Enhance variable description and validate default valueThe variable structure is correct, but consider the following improvements:
- Expand the description to clarify the purpose and expected format of the organization name
- Consider whether a default value of "test" is appropriate, as it might lead to unintended resource creation if not overridden
variable "cloudsmith_org" { type = string - description = "Cloudsmith test org" + description = "The organization name in Cloudsmith to be used for testing. Must be a valid Cloudsmith organization identifier." default = "test" }internal/tui/utils/utils.go (1)
10-11
: Enhance function documentationThe current documentation doesn't describe the function's behavior when color is not supported or potential error conditions.
-// PrintStyledText prints a styled text to the terminal +// PrintStyledText prints a styled text to the terminal using ASCII art. +// If the terminal doesn't support colors, it silently returns without printing. +// Returns an error if text styling fails.cmd/docs.go (1)
15-15
: Consider making the documentation output path configurable.The documentation output path is currently hardcoded to "./docs". Consider making this configurable through a flag or environment variable to provide more flexibility.
Here's a suggested implementation:
var docsCmd = &cobra.Command{ Use: "docs", Short: "Generate documentation for the CLI", SilenceUsage: true, Hidden: true, + Flags: func() *pflag.FlagSet { + flags := pflag.NewFlagSet("docs", pflag.ExitOnError) + flags.String("output-dir", "./docs", "Directory where documentation will be generated") + return flags + }(), RunE: func(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) error { - err := doc.GenMarkdownTree(cmd.Root(), "./docs") + outputDir, _ := cmd.Flags().GetString("output-dir") + err := doc.GenMarkdownTree(cmd.Root(), outputDir) if err != nil { return err } return nil }, }docs/terramaid_run.md (3)
5-7
: Add language specification to the code block.For better syntax highlighting and documentation consistency, specify the language for the code block.
-``` +```bash terramaid run [flags]<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)</summary> 5-5: null Fenced code blocks should have a language specified (MD040, fenced-code-language) </details> </details> --- `11-20`: **Add language specification and document valid values.** 1. Specify the language for the code block for better syntax highlighting. 2. Consider documenting the valid values for the following options: - `--chart-type`: List supported Mermaid chart types - `--direction`: List valid diagram directions (TD, LR, etc.) ```diff -``` +```bash -c, --chart-type string Specify the type of Mermaid chart to generate (env: TERRAMAID_CHART_TYPE) (default "flowchart")
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
11-11: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
24-24
: Replace hard tab with spaces.For consistency and better compatibility, replace the hard tab with spaces.
-* [terramaid](terramaid.md) - A utility for generating Mermaid diagrams from Terraform configurations +* [terramaid](terramaid.md) - A utility for generating Mermaid diagrams from Terraform configurations🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
24-24: Column: 28
Hard tabs(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
test/multi/main.tf (1)
5-10
: Consider parameterizing repository configurationThe repository configuration contains hardcoded values for description, name, and slug. Consider making these configurable through variables for better reusability and flexibility.
resource "cloudsmith_repository" "my_repository" { - description = "A certifiably-awesome private package repository" - name = "My Repository" + description = var.repository_description + name = var.repository_name namespace = data.cloudsmith_organization.my_organization.slug_perm - slug = "test-repo" + slug = var.repository_slug }.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-61
: Consider refactoring to reduce duplicationAll jobs (test_aws, test_gcp, test_az, test_multi) share identical structure and steps. This leads to maintenance overhead and potential inconsistencies.
Consider these improvements:
- Use a reusable workflow to define the common job structure
- Implement a test matrix for different providers
- Add job dependencies if tests need to run in specific order
Here's a suggested refactor:
name: "Test Terramaid Outputs" on: pull_request: push: branches: - main jobs: - test_aws: - runs-on: ubuntu-latest - steps: - - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - # ... (other steps) - test_gcp: - runs-on: ubuntu-latest - steps: - - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - # ... (other steps) - test_az: - runs-on: ubuntu-latest - steps: - - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - # ... (other steps) - test_multi: - runs-on: ubuntu-latest - steps: - - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - # ... (other steps) + test: + strategy: + matrix: + provider: [aws, gcp, az, multi] + runs-on: ubuntu-latest + steps: + - uses: actions/checkout@v4 + - uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3 + - uses: actions/setup-go@v5 + with: + go-version-file: "go.mod" + cache: true + - run: | + make build + build/terramaid -w test/${{ matrix.provider }} + cat Terramaid.md
56-57
: Consider enabling Go module cachingSetting
cache: false
for Go modules can significantly impact CI performance by requiring fresh downloads for each run.with: go-version-file: "go.mod" - cache: false + cache: truecmd/version.go (2)
22-37
: Improve error handling and loggingWhile the command structure is good, consider logging the error when version check fails to help with debugging.
latestReleaseTag, err := latestRelease() - if err == nil && latestReleaseTag != "" { + if err != nil { + fmt.Fprintf(cmd.ErrOrStderr(), "Warning: Unable to check for updates: %v\n", err) + } else if latestReleaseTag != "" {
33-34
: Enhance update notification with installation instructionsThe update notification could be more helpful by including instructions on how to update.
if semver.Compare(latestRelease, currentRelease) > 0 { - updateTerramaid(latestRelease) + updateTerramaid(latestRelease, "To update, visit: https://github.com/RoseSecurity/Terramaid#installation")README.md (2)
Line range hint
115-144
: Fix inconsistencies in command documentation and flag typo.There are several issues in the help command output:
- The usage section shows
terramaid [flags]
but should beterramaid run [flags]
based on the new command structure.- The
run
command is missing from the "Available Commands" section despite being the primary command.- There's a typo in the working directory flag:
--working-wir
should be--working-dir
.Please update the help output to reflect the correct command structure and fix the typo:
Usage: - terramaid [flags] + terramaid run [flags] terramaid [command] Available Commands: completion Generate the autocompletion script for the specified shell + run Generate Mermaid diagrams from Terraform configurations help Help about any command version Print the CLI version Flags: -r, --direction string Specify the direction of the flowchart (env: TERRAMAID_DIRECTION) (default "TD") -h, --help help for terramaid -o, --output string Output file for Mermaid diagram (env: TERRAMAID_OUTPUT) (default "Terramaid.md") -s, --subgraph-name string Specify the subgraph name of the flowchart (env: TERRAMAID_SUBGRAPH_NAME) (default "Terraform") -b, --tf-binary string Path to Terraform binary (env: TERRAMAID_TF_BINARY) -d, --tf-dir string Path to Terraform directory (env: TERRAMAID_TF_DIR) (default ".") -p, --tf-plan string Path to Terraform plan file (env: TERRAMAID_TF_PLAN) - -w, --working-wir string Working directory for Terraform (env: TERRAMAID_WORKING_DIR) (default ".") + -w, --working-dir string Working directory for Terraform (env: TERRAMAID_WORKING_DIR) (default ".")
Line range hint
152-161
: Update contributing guidelines with testing requirements.Since the project now includes tests for multiple Terraform providers, consider updating the contributing guidelines to include testing requirements and guidelines for contributors.
Add a section about testing requirements after step 3:
1. **Fork** the repo on GitHub 2. **Clone** the project to your own machine 3. **Commit** changes to your own branch +4. **Test** your changes with multiple Terraform providers + - Run existing tests: `make test` + - Add new tests for new features 4. **Push** your work back up to your fork 5. Submit a **Pull Request** so that we can review your changescmd/root.go (3)
6-7
: Ensure consistent import aliasing and organizationThe imports are aliased (
tuiUtils
andu
) for brevity, which is good for readability. However, ensure that the aliasing is consistent throughout the codebase and consider organizing imports into standard library packages, third-party packages, and local packages.
34-34
: Clarify the purpose ofDisableAutoGenTag
The comment mentions disabling an auto-generated string for clean documentation. Ensure that this setting aligns with the desired documentation output and consider providing more context if necessary.
37-39
: Enhance error messages for better user experienceIn the
Execute()
function, ifrootCmd.Execute()
returns an error, the application exits usingu.LogErrorAndExit(err)
. To improve user experience, consider providing more informative error messages or suggestions for resolving common errors.For example:
func Execute() { if err := rootCmd.Execute(); err != nil { - u.LogErrorAndExit(err) + u.LogError("Execution failed: ", err) + fmt.Println("Use 'terramaid --help' for more information.") + os.Exit(1) } }This approach offers the user guidance on how to proceed after an error occurs.
internal/flowchart.go (3)
15-25
: Refactor to eliminate code duplication inCleanID
functionThe
CleanID
function performs similarstrings.ReplaceAll
operations in both theif
andelse
branches to replace"."
and"/"
characters. Consider moving these replacements outside theif
statement to avoid duplication and improve maintainability.Refactored code:
func CleanID(id string) string { id = labelCleaner.ReplaceAllString(id, "") if strings.HasPrefix(id, "provider[") { id = strings.ReplaceAll(id, "provider[", "provider_") id = strings.ReplaceAll(id, "]", "") } id = strings.ReplaceAll(id, ".", "_") id = strings.ReplaceAll(id, "/", "_") return id }
85-101
: Refactor edge processing to eliminate code duplicationThe logic for adding nodes in the edge processing loop is duplicated for
fromID
andtoID
. Consider refactoring this code into a helper function to improve readability and maintainability.Example refactoring:
func addNodeIfNotExists(nodeID string, label string) { if _, exists := addedNodes[nodeID]; !exists { if label != "" { sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf(" %s[\"%s\"]\n", nodeID, label)) } else { sb.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf(" %s[\"%s\"]\n", nodeID, nodeID)) } addedNodes[nodeID] = label } } // Then in the loop: addNodeIfNotExists(fromID, fromLabel) addNodeIfNotExists(toID, toLabel)
39-101
: Consider adding unit tests forGenerateMermaidFlowchart
functionTo ensure the correctness and robustness of the
GenerateMermaidFlowchart
function, consider adding unit tests that cover various scenarios, including different graph structures, directions, subgraphs, and edge cases.Would you like assistance in creating unit tests for this function?
cmd/run.go (1)
41-44
: Simplify error messages by using%q
instead of escaped quotesIn your error messages, you can use the
%q
verb infmt.Errorf
to automatically add quotes around strings. This improves readability and avoids manual escaping.Apply this diff to simplify the error messages:
func generateDiagrams(opts *options) error { // After reordering validation checks if opts.WorkingDir != "" { exists, err := utils.TerraformFilesExist(opts.WorkingDir) if err != nil { - return fmt.Errorf("error checking Terraform files in directory \"%s\": %v", opts.WorkingDir, err) + return fmt.Errorf("error checking Terraform files in directory %q: %v", opts.WorkingDir, err) } if !exists { - return fmt.Errorf("Terraform files do not exist in directory \"%s\"", opts.WorkingDir) + return fmt.Errorf("Terraform files do not exist in directory %q", opts.WorkingDir) } } // Validation of working directory existence if opts.WorkingDir != "" && !utils.DirExists(opts.WorkingDir) { - return fmt.Errorf("terraform directory \"%s\" does not exist", opts.WorkingDir) + return fmt.Errorf("Terraform directory %q does not exist", opts.WorkingDir) }Also applies to: 50-50
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/img/terramaid_vhs_demo.gif
is excluded by!**/*.gif
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
.github/workflows/test.yml
(1 hunks)README.md
(2 hunks)cmd/docs.go
(1 hunks)cmd/root.go
(1 hunks)cmd/run.go
(1 hunks)cmd/version.go
(1 hunks)docs/GitHub_Actions_Integration.md
(1 hunks)docs/GitLab_Pipelines_Integration.md
(1 hunks)docs/terramaid_run.md
(1 hunks)go.mod
(1 hunks)internal/flowchart.go
(1 hunks)internal/tui/utils/utils.go
(1 hunks)main.go
(1 hunks)test/multi/main.tf
(1 hunks)test/multi/outputs.tf
(1 hunks)test/multi/variables.tf
(1 hunks)test/multi/versions.tf
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- test/multi/versions.tf
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
docs/terramaid_run.md
24-24: Column: 28
Hard tabs
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
5-5: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
11-11: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🪛 checkov (3.2.312)
test/multi/main.tf
[HIGH] 28-35: Ensure Instance Metadata Service Version 1 is not enabled
(CKV_AWS_79)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
main.go (1)
6-6
:
Critical: Restore error handling in main()
The removal of error handling from main()
could lead to silent failures. The main function should catch and properly handle fatal errors from cmd.Execute()
.
Apply this diff to restore error handling:
func main() {
- cmd.Execute()
+ if err := cmd.Execute(); err != nil {
+ os.Exit(1)
+ }
}
Let's verify the error handling in the cmd package:
test/multi/outputs.tf (1)
1-4
: Verify the referenced data source exists
The output looks well-structured, but we should verify that data.aws_ami.ubuntu
is properly defined in the test configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the data source definition by checking its implementation.
Data source reference is properly defined and configured
The data.aws_ami.ubuntu
data source is correctly defined in test/multi/main.tf
with proper filters for Ubuntu 22.04 LTS AMI, making the output reference valid and well-structured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the referenced data source exists in the test configuration
# Expected: Find the data source definition in main.tf or other configuration files
# Search for the AWS AMI data source definition
rg -t tf 'data\s+"aws_ami"\s+"ubuntu"' test/multi/
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete data source definition to ensure it's properly configured
rg -t tf -A 10 'data\s+"aws_ami"\s+"ubuntu"' test/multi/
Length of output: 491
test/multi/variables.tf (2)
7-11
: Document GCP-specific requirements and naming constraints
The variable is well-structured, but the documentation could be enhanced to include GCP-specific requirements.
variable "consent_store_name" {
type = string
- description = "Consent store name for GCP"
+ description = "Name for the GCP Healthcare consent store. Must be between 1-100 characters, containing only letters, numbers, underscores, and hyphens."
default = "my-consent-store"
}
Let's verify if there are any other consent store resources defined in the codebase to ensure consistent naming patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Documentation enhancement suggestion is valid but can be more specific
The variable is used in a single consent store resource in test/multi/main.tf
, and there are no other instances or conflicting naming patterns in the codebase. The suggested documentation improvement is appropriate but can be more precise about GCP Healthcare API's specific requirements.
variable "consent_store_name" {
type = string
- description = "Consent store name for GCP"
+ description = "Name for the GCP Healthcare consent store. Must be unique within the dataset and match the pattern [a-zA-Z0-9_-]{1,100}. Used as identifier in google_healthcare_consent_store resource."
default = "my-consent-store"
}
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other consent store resource definitions
rg -t tf "google_healthcare_consent_store" -A 5
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any other files that reference consent store naming patterns or requirements
rg -t tf "consent.*store.*name" -g '!test/multi/variables.tf'
# Also check for any documentation files that might contain naming guidelines
fd README.md | xargs cat
Length of output: 6000
1-12
: Consider adding usage examples in comments
Since these variables are part of a multi-provider test setup, it would be helpful to add comments showing example usage and how these variables interact with the test workflow.
Add a comment block at the top of the file explaining:
- The purpose of these variables in the test suite
- Example values for different test scenarios
- How to override these values in the test workflow
+# Test configuration variables for multi-provider testing
+# Usage:
+# terraform plan -var="cloudsmith_org=my-test-org" -var="consent_store_name=test-consent-store"
+
variable "cloudsmith_org" {
Let's check how these variables are used in the test workflow:
✅ Verification successful
Documentation suggestion can be refined based on actual usage
The variables are actively used in a multi-provider test configuration that includes AWS, GCP, and Cloudsmith resources. Based on the actual usage:
cloudsmith_org
is used to configure a Cloudsmith organization and repositoryconsent_store_name
is used to name a GCP Healthcare consent store
Let's refine the documentation suggestion:
+# Multi-provider test configuration variables
+#
+# This file defines variables for testing integration with multiple cloud providers:
+# - Cloudsmith: Organization and repository setup
+# - GCP: Healthcare consent store configuration
+#
+# Example usage:
+# terraform plan \
+# -var="cloudsmith_org=my-org" \ # Used for Cloudsmith repository namespace
+# -var="consent_store_name=test-consent" # Used for GCP Healthcare consent store name
+
variable "cloudsmith_org" {
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for variable usage in GitHub Actions workflow
rg -t yaml "cloudsmith_org|consent_store_name" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how these variables are used in the test files
rg -l "cloudsmith_org|consent_store_name" test/
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the actual test configurations
find test/multi/ -type f -name "*.tf" -exec cat {} \;
Length of output: 1734
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any test documentation files
fd -e md . test/
Length of output: 18
internal/tui/utils/utils.go (2)
3-8
: Verify dependency management for new packages
The new dependencies figurine
and supportscolor
need to be properly versioned in go.mod.
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies are properly managed and secure
The dependencies are correctly versioned in go.mod:
- github.com/arsham/figurine v1.3.0
- github.com/jwalton/go-supportscolor v1.2.0
No security vulnerabilities were found for these packages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if dependencies are properly managed and their versions
# Expected: Dependencies should be listed in go.mod with specific versions
# Check go.mod for the new dependencies
echo "Checking go.mod for dependencies..."
rg -A 1 "github.com/(arsham/figurine|jwalton/go-supportscolor)" go.mod
# Check for potential security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: GO, package: "github.com/arsham/figurine") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 607
14-14
: Verify font file availability
The hardcoded font "ANSI Regular.flf" needs to be available at runtime.
cmd/docs.go (1)
9-21
: LGTM! The command implementation is clean and follows best practices.
The implementation:
- Uses proper error handling
- Has clear documentation
- Is appropriately hidden as an internal command
- Follows the cobra command pattern correctly
docs/terramaid_run.md (1)
1-25
: Documentation looks comprehensive and well-structured!
The documentation effectively covers:
- Command purpose and syntax
- All available options with their environment variables
- Default values and configuration flexibility
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
24-24: Column: 28
Hard tabs
(MD010, no-hard-tabs)
5-5: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
11-11: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
test/multi/main.tf (1)
12-26
: LGTM: Well-configured AMI data source
The AMI configuration is secure, using specific filters and the official Canonical owner ID.
go.mod (1)
6-16
: Verify the new direct dependencies align with minimum version requirements
The new dependencies added (figurine
, go-supportscolor
, markdown
) support the PR objectives for improved rendering and TUI. However, we should verify they meet the minimum version requirements for security and compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to check the version compatibility and dependencies more thoroughly.
Dependencies are using stable versions with no security concerns
The verification shows:
- All new dependencies are using stable versions:
github.com/arsham/figurine v1.3.0
github.com/jwalton/go-supportscolor v1.2.0
github.com/nao1215/markdown v0.6.0
- No security vulnerabilities were found in the GitHub Advisory Database
- All packages have corresponding entries in go.sum, indicating proper version resolution
- No replace directives that could affect version requirements
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for latest versions and security advisories for new dependencies
# Check latest versions on pkg.go.dev
for pkg in "github.com/arsham/figurine" "github.com/jwalton/go-supportscolor" "github.com/nao1215/markdown" "golang.org/x/mod"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
curl -s "https://pkg.go.dev/$pkg" | grep -A 1 "Latest version"
done
# Check for known vulnerabilities using GitHub Advisory Database
for pkg in "arsham/figurine" "jwalton/go-supportscolor" "nao1215/markdown"; do
echo "Checking security advisories for $pkg..."
gh api graphql -f query='{
securityVulnerabilities(first:5, ecosystem:GO, package:"github.com/'$pkg'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done
Length of output: 3256
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check go.mod and go.sum for version information and dependencies
# Show direct dependencies and their versions
echo "Direct dependencies from go.mod:"
cat go.mod | grep -A 20 "require ("
# Check if go.sum exists and show entries for new packages
echo -e "\nChecking versions in go.sum for new packages:"
for pkg in "github.com/arsham/figurine" "github.com/jwalton/go-supportscolor" "github.com/nao1215/markdown"; do
echo -e "\n$pkg versions:"
grep "^$pkg" go.sum || echo "No entry found in go.sum"
done
# Check for any replace directives
echo -e "\nChecking for replace directives:"
grep "^replace" go.mod || echo "No replace directives found"
# Check minimum Go version
echo -e "\nGo version requirement:"
grep "^go " go.mod
Length of output: 3241
cmd/version.go (1)
12-12
: LGTM! Good choice using the standard semver package
The addition of golang.org/x/mod/semver
is appropriate for semantic version comparison.
docs/GitHub_Actions_Integration.md (1)
53-53
: Verify integration with the new command structure.
Let's ensure the new run
command works correctly in the CI environment and produces the expected Mermaid diagrams.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information about the command's integration across the codebase.
The terramaid run
command is properly integrated and documented across the codebase
The command is consistently documented and implemented across multiple integration contexts:
- Detailed documentation in
docs/terramaid_run.md
with command flags and options - Integration examples in both GitHub Actions (
docs/GitHub_Actions_Integration.md
) and GitLab Pipelines (docs/GitLab_Pipelines_Integration.md
) - Docker-based usage documented in
README.md
with proper volume mounting - Consistent command structure across all implementations (
terramaid run [flags]
)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and functionality of the new run command
# Check if the run command is documented in the codebase
echo "Checking for run command documentation..."
rg -l "terramaid run" --type md
# Look for any error handling or validation around the run command
echo "Checking for error handling patterns..."
rg "terramaid run" -C 3
Length of output: 2047
cmd/root.go (1)
29-31
: Verify that subcommands are properly defined and imported
The rootCmd
adds runCmd
, docsCmd
, and versionCmd
as subcommands. Ensure that these subcommands are defined and properly imported so they function correctly.
Run the following script to verify the definitions of the subcommands:
✅ Verification successful
All subcommands are properly defined in their respective files
The verification confirms that all three commands are correctly defined as Cobra commands in their respective files:
runCmd
in cmd/run.godocsCmd
in cmd/docs.goversionCmd
in cmd/version.go
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if runCmd, docsCmd, and versionCmd are defined in the codebase.
# Expectation: Definitions of the commands should be found.
fd --type f --extension go --exclude vendor | xargs grep -E 'var (runCmd|docsCmd|versionCmd) = &cobra.Command'
Length of output: 242
cmd/run.go (1)
91-108
: Well-structured initialization and flag binding
The init()
function effectively parses environment variables with a prefix and binds command-line flags to the opts
struct. This approach provides flexibility for users to configure the command through both environment variables and CLI flags.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
58-60
: Consider enhancing error handling and job coordination.The current implementation could benefit from:
- Explicit error handling for the build and test commands
- Job dependencies or conditions if tests need to run in a specific order
Consider updating the run block with error handling:
- run: | make build + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "Build failed" + exit 1 + fi build/terramaid run -w test/multi + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then + echo "Tests failed" + exit 1 + fi cat Terramaid.mdIf job ordering is important, consider adding:
needs: [test_aws, test_gcp, test_az]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/test.yml
(3 hunks)go.mod
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/test.yml (2)
21-21
: LGTM! Command updates are consistent across all jobs.
The addition of the run
subcommand is uniformly applied across all test jobs, maintaining consistency in the workflow.
Also applies to: 34-34, 47-47
49-60
: LGTM! New test job follows established pattern.
The test_multi
job maintains consistency with existing jobs in terms of setup steps and execution pattern.
What and Why
run
commandSummary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
terramaid run
for generating Mermaid diagrams from Terraform configurations.test_multi
in the GitHub Actions workflow for multi-configuration testing.ubuntu_ami
added to retrieve the Ubuntu AWS AMI ID.Documentation
README.md
with refined command usage and installation instructions.terramaid run
command, detailing its options and usage.versions.tf
file specifying required Terraform version and providers.Bug Fixes
versionCmd
for better semantic versioning checks.Chores