Removed ML from well known pattern

[babenek]

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which is fixed.

• removed extra "use_ml: false" - it is by default
• disabled ML for good recognised patterns
• Fix Benchmark scores

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

• UnitTest
• Benchmark

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (3467170) 90.71% compared to head (b66eb69) 90.66%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #448      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.71%   90.66%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         125      125              
  Lines        4179     4179              
  Branches      662      662              
==========================================
- Hits         3791     3789       -2     
- Misses        253      254       +1     
- Partials      135      136       +1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[csh519]

I'm actually a little worried about remove ML from many rules..
But the benchmark results prove it, so let's merge it this time.

LGTM 👍

[kmnls]

Agree