chore(test): adding integration test and normal unit test #93
Conversation
…nhance config loader, and clean up unused code
…eplace console logs with Logger, and clean up unused test files
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/copy-project-template.spec.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes across the backend codebase, focusing on standardizing logging mechanisms, updating test configurations, and refining dependency management. The modifications primarily involve transitioning from console logging to NestJS's Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Test Runner
participant isIntegrationTest
participant TestSuite
participant Logger
Test Runner->>isIntegrationTest: Check environment flag
isIntegrationTest-->>Test Runner: Return boolean
alt Integration Tests Enabled
Test Runner->>TestSuite: Execute tests
TestSuite->>Logger: Log test information
else Integration Tests Disabled
Test Runner->>TestSuite: Skip tests
end
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
backend/src/embedding/openai-embbeding-provider.ts (1)
Line range hint
4-11: Improve singleton pattern implementationThe current singleton implementation has several issues:
- Unused static
openAiproperty- Public constructor allows creating multiple instances
- Missing type annotation for instance
export class OpenAIEmbProvider { private logger = new Logger(OpenAIEmbProvider.name); - private static instance: OpenAIEmbProvider; - private openAi: OpenAI; - static openAi: any; // Remove unused static property + private static instance: OpenAIEmbProvider | null = null; + private readonly openAi: OpenAI; static getInstance(): OpenAIEmbProvider { if (this.instance) { return this.instance; } - return new OpenAIEmbProvider(); + this.instance = new OpenAIEmbProvider(); + return this.instance; } - constructor() { + private constructor() { this.openAi = new OpenAI({ apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY, }); }backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create-and-path.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
11-17: Remove or fix commented cleanup codeThe cleanup function is currently ineffective as all its logic is commented out. Either implement proper cleanup or remove the function entirely.
backend/src/config/config-loader.ts (1)
Line range hint
124-134: Enhance error handling for config file operations.The config saving operation could benefit from more robust error handling.
private saveConfig() { - const configDir = path.dirname(this.configPath); - if (!fs.existsSync(configDir)) { - fs.mkdirSync(configDir, { recursive: true }); - } - fs.writeFileSync( - this.configPath, - JSON.stringify(ConfigLoader.config, null, 2), - 'utf-8', - ); + try { + const configDir = path.dirname(this.configPath); + if (!fs.existsSync(configDir)) { + fs.mkdirSync(configDir, { recursive: true }); + } + fs.writeFileSync( + this.configPath, + JSON.stringify(ConfigLoader.config, null, 2), + 'utf-8', + ); + this.logger.log(`Configuration saved successfully to ${this.configPath}`); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error(`Failed to save configuration: ${error.message}`); + throw new Error(`Failed to save configuration: ${error.message}`); + } }
🧹 Nitpick comments (21)
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (1)
41-41: Convert Chinese comment to English for consistency.The comment "修改这里" should be in English to maintain code consistency and accessibility for all team members.
- // 修改这里 + // Modified messages field type definitionbackend/src/common/utils.ts (2)
1-4: Fix typo in JSDoc commentThe word "wether" should be "whether" in the documentation.
- * @returns wether is integration test or not + * @returns whether is integration test or not
5-5: Add TypeScript return type annotationConsider adding an explicit return type for better type safety and documentation.
-export const isIntegrationTest = !!process.env.INTEGRATION_TEST; +export const isIntegrationTest: boolean = !!process.env.INTEGRATION_TEST;backend/src/embedding/__tests__/loadAllEmbModels.spec.ts (1)
20-48: Improve test configuration and organizationSeveral improvements can be made to enhance test maintainability:
- The timeout value (6000000ms = 100 minutes) is excessive
- Test data should be extracted to constants
- Consider using beforeAll for provider initialization
+const TEST_DOCUMENTS = [ + 'passage: Hello, World!', + 'query: Hello, World!', + 'passage: This is an example passage.', + 'fastembed-js is licensed under MIT', +]; + +const REASONABLE_TIMEOUT = 30000; // 30 seconds + (isIntegrationTest ? describe : describe.skip)( 'testing embedding provider', () => { let openAiProvider: OpenAIEmbProvider; + + beforeAll(() => { + openAiProvider = OpenAIEmbProvider.getInstance(); + }); it('should load real local models specified in config', async () => { - const documents = [ - 'passage: Hello, World!', - 'query: Hello, World!', - 'passage: This is an example passage.', - // You can leave out the prefix but it's recommended - 'fastembed-js is licensed under MIT', - ]; await localEmbProvider.generateEmbResponse( EmbeddingModel.BGEBaseENV15, - documents, + TEST_DOCUMENTS, ); - }, 6000000); + }, REASONABLE_TIMEOUT); it('should load real openai embedding models', async () => { - openAiProvider = OpenAIEmbProvider.getInstance(); const res = await openAiProvider.generateEmbResponse( 'text-embedding-3-small', 'test document', ); Logger.log(res); - }, 6000000); + }, REASONABLE_TIMEOUT); }, );backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create-and-path.spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
52-77: Refactor test code organizationThe test code could be better organized:
- Move generated code to a constant
- Extract file generation logic to a helper function
- Add assertions to verify the generated file
+const EXAMPLE_CONTROLLER = ` + import { Controller, Get } from '@nestjs/common'; + + @Controller('example') + export class ExampleController { + @Get() + getHello(): string { + return 'Hello World!'; + } + } +`; + +async function generateExampleController(): Promise<string> { + const fileName = 'example.controller.ts'; + try { + return await saveGeneratedCode(fileName, EXAMPLE_CONTROLLER); + } catch (error) { + const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error); + Logger.error(`Failed to save generated code: ${errorMessage}`); + throw error; + } +} -async function generateAndSaveCode() { - const generatedCode = `...`; - const fileName = 'example.controller.ts'; - try { - const filePath = await saveGeneratedCode(fileName, generatedCode); - Logger.log(`Generated code saved at: ${filePath}`); - } catch (error) { - Logger.error('Failed to save generated code:', error); - } -} +it('should create and return the root directory', async () => { + const filePath = await generateExampleController(); + expect(filePath).toBeDefined(); + expect(filePath).toContain('example.controller.ts'); +});backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-file-create.spec.ts (1)
56-56: Consider adding more detailed logging.While switching to NestJS Logger is good, consider adding more context to the log message, such as the number of files generated and their paths.
- Logger.log('File generation result:', result); + Logger.log(`File generation completed. Generated ${files.length} files:`, result);backend/src/downloader/__tests__/download-model.spec.ts (2)
12-22: Consider moving Array.isArray mock to test utils.The Array.isArray mock is a good solution for handling Float32Array and BigInt64Array, but it should be moved to a shared test utilities file for reuse.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 14-15: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
33-36: Extract test configuration to constants.Consider moving the test configuration values to constants at the top of the file or a separate test config file.
+ const TEST_MODEL_CONFIG = { + model: 'Xenova/flan-t5-small', + endpoint: 'http://localhost:11434/v1', + token: 'your-token-here', + task: 'text2text-generation', + } as const; + const TEST_EMB_CONFIG = { + model: 'fast-bge-base-en-v1.5', + endpoint: 'http://localhost:11434/v1', + token: 'your-token-here', + } as const;Also applies to: 40-44
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test-generate-doc.spec.ts (2)
6-6: Remove redundant TODO comment.The TODO comment about adding integration flag can be removed as it's already implemented.
- // TODO: adding integration flag
11-69: Consider moving test sequence to a fixture file.The test sequence configuration is quite large and could be moved to a separate fixture file to improve test readability and maintainability.
backend/src/downloader/universal-utils.ts (1)
24-26: Consider enhancing log messages with more context.While the logging standardization is good, the messages could be more descriptive:
-Logger.log('embedding load starts'); +Logger.log('Starting embedding model download and initialization'); -Logger.log('embedding load ends'); +Logger.log('Completed embedding model initialization'); -Logger.log('embedding load finished'); +Logger.log('Successfully loaded and verified embedding model');Also applies to: 45-45
backend/src/build-system/__tests__/fullstack-gen.spec.ts (1)
147-147: Enhance log message with more context.The log message could be more descriptive about what kind of logs are being saved.
-Logger.log(`Logs saved to: ${result.logFolderPath}`); +Logger.log(`Build sequence execution logs saved to: ${result.logFolderPath}`);backend/src/build-system/__tests__/test.backend-code-generator.spec.ts (2)
113-117: Enhance error handling and logging.The error handling could be improved with more context and better error object handling:
-Logger.error(`Handler ${node.name} failed with error:`, resultData.error); +Logger.error(`Handler ${node.name} failed during sequence execution:`, { + step: step.name, + nodeId: node.id, + error: resultData.error +}); -Logger.error('Error during sequence execution:', error); +Logger.error('Build sequence execution failed:', { + error: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + sequence: sequence.id +}); fs.writeFileSync( path.join(logFolderPath, 'error.txt'), - `Error: ${error.message}\n${error.stack}`, + JSON.stringify({ + timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), + error: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + sequence: sequence.id + }, null, 2), 'utf8' );Also applies to: 126-132
108-108: Improve success logging messages.The success log messages could be more descriptive:
-Logger.log(`Result for ${node.name}:`, resultData); +Logger.log(`Successfully executed ${step.name} - ${node.name}:`, resultData); -Logger.log('Sequence executed successfully. Logs stored in:', logFolderPath); +Logger.log('Backend code generation sequence completed successfully:', { + sequenceId: sequence.id, + logPath: logFolderPath +});Also applies to: 121-124
backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.ts (2)
33-41: Consider adding error scenarios to the mock.The ModelProvider mock only handles the success case. Consider adding test coverage for error scenarios.
jest.mock('src/common/model-provider', () => ({ ModelProvider: { getInstance: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ chatSync: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ content: 'Mocked response', }), + // Add error scenario + chatSyncError: jest.fn().mockRejectedValue( + new Error('Mocked error response') + ), }), }, }));
103-143: Enhance test assertions for comprehensive validation.While the test covers the basic workflow, it could benefit from additional assertions:
- Validate user properties beyond just username
- Verify chat metadata (createdAt, updatedAt)
- Assert message properties (role, timestamps)
expect(user).toBeDefined(); expect(user.username).toBe(userData.username); +expect(user.email).toBe(userData.email); +expect(user.id).toBeDefined(); const chat = await chatService.createChat(user.id, { title: 'test chat', }); expect(chat).toBeDefined(); expect(chat.title).toBe('test chat'); +expect(chat.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date); +expect(chat.updatedAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date); const userMessage = await chatService.saveMessage( chat.id, 'Hello, this is a test message.', MessageRole.User, ); expect(userMessage).toBeDefined(); +expect(userMessage.role).toBe(MessageRole.User); +expect(userMessage.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);backend/src/build-system/__tests__/utils.ts (2)
138-140: Consider structured logging for metrics.Using console.table with Logger.log creates inconsistent logging styles. Consider using structured logging throughout.
- Logger.log('\nSequence Metrics:'); - console.table(metricsJson); + Logger.log({ + message: 'Sequence Metrics', + metrics: metricsJson + });
208-209: Enhance error logging with context.Error logging could be more informative with additional context about the sequence.
- Logger.error('\nError during sequence execution:'); - Logger.error(error); + Logger.error(`Error during sequence execution (${sequence.name}):`, { + sequenceId: sequence.id, + error: error.message, + stack: error.stack + });backend/src/build-system/__tests__/virtual-dir.spec.ts (2)
1-2: Add more context to TODO comment.The TODO comment is vague. Please provide more context about what kind of example needs to be added and why.
-// TODO: adding virtual dir example here +// TODO: Add example demonstrating virtual directory structure and usage patterns
27-27: Consider more descriptive logging.While the change to Logger is good, consider adding more context to the log message for better debugging.
- Logger.log(files); + Logger.log('Virtual directory files:', files);backend/package.json (1)
Line range hint
29-30: Consider pinning dependency versions instead of using 'latest'.Using
"latest"for@huggingface/huband@huggingface/transformerscan lead to unexpected breaking changes when dependencies auto-update. Consider:
- Pinning to specific versions
- Using caret (^) or tilde (~) version ranges
- Implementing a dependency update strategy with tools like Dependabot
🛑 Comments failed to post (10)
backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts (2)
17-17: 💡 Codebase verification
HttpModule removal is safe, but cleanup needed
The removal of
HttpModulefrom imports is safe as there are no HTTP-dependent tests. However, you should also remove the unusedHttpServiceimport fromchat.service.ts.🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the removal of HttpModule's impact on tests
The removal of
HttpModulefrom imports might affect tests that depend on HTTP functionality. Ensure that all existing tests have been updated to mock any HTTP dependencies.Let's check for any HTTP-dependent tests that might be affected:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for HTTP-related test files and usages rg -l "HttpModule|HttpService" "backend/src/**/*.(spec|test).ts"Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find all test files echo "=== Test Files ===" fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/ # Then search for HTTP-related code in all TypeScript files under chat module echo -e "\n=== HTTP Usage in Chat Module ===" rg -l "HttpModule|HttpService" backend/src/chat/Length of output: 1098
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check HTTP usage in service implementation echo "=== HTTP Usage in ChatService ===" rg "HttpService|@Inject.*HttpService" -A 3 backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts # Check test file for HTTP dependencies echo -e "\n=== HTTP Usage in Test ===" cat backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.tsLength of output: 5105
29-29: 💡 Codebase verification
Add tests for ChatGuard
The removal of ModelProvider from exports doesn't impact existing tests as it was directly imported and mocked. However, while verifying test coverage:
- ChatService has comprehensive integration tests ✓
- ChatGuard is exported but lacks test coverage
⚠️ Consider adding unit tests for ChatGuard to ensure its functionality is properly verified.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test coverage after ModelProvider removal
The removal of
ModelProviderfrom exports changes the module's public API. This requires:
- Updating any tests that were importing ModelProvider through ChatModule
- Verifying that ChatService and ChatGuard tests remain comprehensive
Let's check for potential test updates needed:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for ModelProvider usage in test files rg "ModelProvider" "backend/src/**/*.(spec|test).ts" # Check for existing test coverage of remaining exports rg "(describe|it).*(ChatService|ChatGuard)" "backend/src/**/*.(spec|test).ts"Length of output: 276
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find test files and search for ModelProvider fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/ --exec rg "ModelProvider" {} || true # Find test files and check for ChatService/ChatGuard tests fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/ --exec rg "(describe|it).*(ChatService|ChatGuard)" {} || true # List all test files to ensure we're not missing anything fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/Length of output: 1192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get full context of ModelProvider usage in tests fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/ --exec rg -B 2 -A 2 "ModelProvider" {} || true # Examine chat-isolation.spec.ts content cat backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.ts # Search for ChatGuard usage in test files with context fd "\.(spec|test)\.ts$" backend/src/ --exec rg -B 2 -A 2 "ChatGuard" {} || trueLength of output: 5240
backend/src/downloader/model-downloader.ts (1)
24-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Standardize logger usage.
There's inconsistent usage of logger between instance (
this.logger) and static (Logger) methods. Stick to using the instance logger for consistency.- Logger.log(this.statusManager); + this.logger.log('Status manager state:', this.statusManager); - Logger.log(path); + this.logger.log(`Download path: ${path}`);Also applies to: 31-31
backend/src/downloader/__tests__/download-model.spec.ts (1)
73-75:
⚠️ Potential issueHandle empty catch block.
The empty catch block silently swallows errors. Consider at least logging the error or adding a comment explaining why errors are ignored.
} catch (error) { - // + // We expect some model outputs to fail in test environment + this.logger.warn('Model output generation failed:', error); }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts (2)
19-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unnecessary constructor.
The empty constructor can be removed as it serves no purpose.
- private readonly models: ModelProvider = ModelProvider.getInstance(); - - constructor() {} + private readonly models: ModelProvider = ModelProvider.getInstance();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private readonly models: ModelProvider = ModelProvider.getInstance();🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 21-21: This constructor is unnecessary.
Unsafe fix: Remove the unnecessary constructor.
(lint/complexity/noUselessConstructor)
26-33: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider error handling for model chat responses.
The streamChat method should include error handling for failed model responses.
streamChat( input: ChatInput, ): CustomAsyncIterableIterator<ChatCompletionChunk> { + try { return this.models.chat( { messages: [{ role: MessageRole.User, content: input.message }], model: input.model, }, input.model, input.chatId, ); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error(`Chat stream error: ${error.message}`, error.stack); + throw error; + } }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts (1)
87-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use Logger.error for error logging.
For error scenarios, especially in security-sensitive methods like token validation, use
Logger.errorinstead ofLogger.logto maintain proper log levels and aid in monitoring/debugging.- Logger.log(error); + Logger.error('Token validation failed:', error);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Logger.error('Token validation failed:', error);backend/src/embedding/local-embedding-provider.ts (1)
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use class logger consistently.
The class has a private logger instance that should be used consistently. Replace the global Logger with the class's logger instance.
- Logger.log(batch); + this.logger.log(batch);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.this.logger.log(batch);backend/package.json (1)
47-48: 💡 Codebase verification
Split embedding feature implementation and integration tests into separate PRs
The new dependencies are part of a new embedding feature implementation (found in
backend/src/embedding/), not just for integration tests. To maintain clear change boundaries:
- Move the embedding feature implementation with its dependencies to a separate PR
- Keep only the integration test changes in this PR
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the necessity of new dependencies.
New dependencies
dotenv,fastembed, andopenaihave been added, which seem unrelated to the PR's objective of adding integration tests. Please clarify:
- Are these dependencies required for the integration tests?
- Should these additions be part of a separate PR focused on model integration?
Let's check if these dependencies are actually used in the integration tests:
Also applies to: 56-56
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of new dependencies in test files echo "Searching for dotenv usage in tests..." rg -l "dotenv" "backend/src/**/*test*" echo "Searching for fastembed usage in tests..." rg -l "fastembed" "backend/src/**/*test*" echo "Searching for openai usage in tests..." rg -l "openai" "backend/src/**/*test*"Length of output: 572
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find test files and search for dependencies echo "=== Test Files ===" fd -t f "test" backend/src/ --exec rg -l "require.*dotenv|from.*dotenv" {} \; fd -t f "test" backend/src/ --exec rg -l "require.*fastembed|from.*fastembed" {} \; fd -t f "test" backend/src/ --exec rg -l "require.*openai|from.*openai" {} \; echo -e "\n=== Implementation Files ===" rg -l "require.*dotenv|from.*dotenv" backend/src/ rg -l "require.*fastembed|from.*fastembed" backend/src/ rg -l "require.*openai|from.*openai" backend/src/Length of output: 812
frontend/src/graphql/schema.gql (1)
140-141: 💡 Codebase verification
Update Role type in frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx to match schema changes
The Role enum changes in schema.gql haven't been fully propagated. The following file still uses the old role definitions:
frontend/src/graphql/type.tsx: Role type is defined as'Model' | 'User'but should be updated to match the new schema enum values ('Assistant' | 'System' | 'User')🔗 Analysis chain
Role enum changes look good but need verification
The changes to standardize role names (replacing 'Model' with 'Assistant' and adding 'System') align with modern chat model conventions. However, we should verify that all consumers of these enum values have been updated accordingly.
Let's verify the usage of these roles across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining references to MessageRole.Model rg -l "MessageRole\.Model|Role\.Model" # Search for places where we need to handle the new System role rg -l "MessageRole\.System|Role\.System"Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for role-related strings with context rg -i "role.*['\"]?(model|assistant|system)['\"]?" -A 2 -B 2 # Search for enum usage in TypeScript files fd -e ts -e tsx -x ast-grep --pattern 'enum $_ { $$$ Model $$$ }' # Search for role-related type definitions ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ = { $$$ role: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 17427
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
backend/.eslintrc.js (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Fix pipeline failure by adding commonjs environment.The pipeline is failing with "'module' is not defined (no-undef)". This is a common issue in ESLint configurations.
Add 'commonjs' to the environments configuration:
module.exports = { parser: '@typescript-eslint/parser', parserOptions: { project: 'tsconfig.json', tsconfigRootDir: __dirname, sourceType: 'module', }, plugins: ['@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin', 'unused-imports'], extends: [ 'plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended', 'plugin:prettier/recommended', '../.eslintrc.js', ], root: true, env: { node: true, jest: true, + commonjs: true, },backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
71-93: Remove commented-out code block.Since the backend implementation generation functionality has been disabled, we should remove the commented-out code block rather than leaving it in the codebase. Commented-out code can lead to confusion and maintenance issues.
- // // Generate backend implementation details - // const implementationPrompt = generateBackendImplementationPrompt( - // backendOverview, - // language, - // framework, - // ); - - // let implementationDetails: string; - // try { - // implementationDetails = await context.model.chatSync( - // { - // content: implementationPrompt, - // }, - // 'gpt-4o-mini', - // ); - // } catch (error) { - // this.logger.error( - // 'Error generating backend implementation details:', - // error, - // ); - // return { - // success: false, - // error: new Error('Failed to generate backend implementation details.'), - // }; - // }
Line range hint
98-108: Clean up implementation field from return type.The TODO comment suggests removing the implementation field. Since it's now always returning an empty string, we should:
- Remove the implementation field from the
BackendRequirementResulttype- Remove it from the return object
type BackendRequirementResult = { overview: string; - implementation: string; config: { language: string; framework: string; packages: Record<string, string>; }; }; return { success: true, data: { overview: removeCodeBlockFences(backendOverview), - // TODO: consider remove implementation - implementation: '', config: { language, framework, packages, }, }, };backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts (1)
File extension validation is missing and should be added
The code currently uses hardcoded values:
- Line 41:
currentFile = 'index.js'- Line 53: Language parameter is set to
'javascript'There's no validation to ensure the file extension matches the specified language, which could cause issues if either value changes in the future.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
89-90: Consider adding file type validation.When saving generated code, validate that the file extension matches the language being used (currently hardcoded as 'javascript' in the
generateBackendCodePromptcall).🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if file extension matches the language currentFile="index.js" language="javascript" if [[ "$currentFile" != *.js && "$language" == "javascript" ]]; then echo "Warning: File extension doesn't match the language" fiLength of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the generateBackendCodePrompt call and its context ast-grep --pattern 'generateBackendCodePrompt($_)' # Check the specific lines mentioned in the hint rg -A 2 -B 2 -n "." "backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts" # Look for any file extension validation rg -i "extension|filetype|\.js|\.ts" "backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts"Length of output: 3825
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the saveGeneratedCode implementation ast-grep --pattern 'function saveGeneratedCode($_) { $$$ }' # Backup search using ripgrep rg -A 10 "saveGeneratedCode" "src/build-system/utils/files.ts"Length of output: 196
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (3)
Line range hint
28-28: Translate or remove the Chinese comment.For better maintainability and consistency, consider either removing the comment "修改这里" or translating it to English.
Line range hint
41-77: Consider adding JSDoc comments for ChatCompletion types.While the code structure is clear, adding JSDoc comments would improve documentation, especially for the ChatCompletionDelta, ChatCompletionChoice, and ChatCompletionChunk types which appear to model OpenAI's chat completion response structure.
Example:
/** * Represents a chunk of the chat completion response during streaming. * Follows OpenAI's chat completion chunk format. */ @ObjectType('ChatCompletionChunkType') export class ChatCompletionChunk { // ... existing fields }
Line range hint
79-81: Consider adding type guard annotation.The
isDoneStatusfunction could benefit from TypeScript's type guard feature to improve type safety:export function isDoneStatus(chunk: ChatCompletionChunk): chunk is ChatCompletionChunk & { status: StreamStatus.DONE } { return chunk.status === StreamStatus.DONE; }backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.ts (2)
27-39: Consider enhancing mock flexibility.While the current mock implementation is functional, consider making it more flexible to support different test scenarios.
jest.mock('src/common/model-provider', () => ({ ModelProvider: { getInstance: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ - chatSync: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ - content: 'Mocked response', - }), + chatSync: jest.fn().mockImplementation((messages) => { + // Simulate different responses based on input + return Promise.resolve({ + content: messages.length > 0 + ? `Response to: ${messages[messages.length - 1].content}` + : 'Default response', + }); + }), }), }, }));
143-150: Consider enhancing cleanup process.While the basic cleanup is in place, consider adding:
- Database cleanup
- Mock reset
- Cache cleanup
afterAll(async () => { if (module) { + // Reset all mocks + jest.clearAllMocks(); + + // Clear cache + await mockJwtCacheService.clearCache(); + + // Clean up database + const connection = module.get('Connection'); + await connection.synchronize(true); + await module.close(); } });backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts (2)
Line range hint
46-47: Track TODOs in issue tracker.These TODOs suggest important architectural improvements:
- Making backend generation similar to FileGenerateHandler
- Implementing file architecture before code generation
These should be tracked in the issue tracker for better visibility and follow-up.
Would you like me to create GitHub issues to track these architectural improvements?
Line range hint
51-52: Make file names configurable.The hardcoded values for
currentFileanddependencyFilereduce flexibility. Consider making these configurable through context or configuration.- const currentFile = 'index.js'; - const dependencyFile = 'dependencies.json'; + const currentFile = context.getGlobalContext('mainFile') || 'index.js'; + const dependencyFile = context.getGlobalContext('dependencyFile') || 'dependencies.json';
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
backend/.eslintrc.js(2 hunks)backend/package.json(2 hunks)backend/src/app.resolver.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/auth/dto/check-token.input.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/auth/role/role.model.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/datamap/index.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/monitor.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/build-system/project-builder.module.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/config/common-path.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/downloader/model-downloader.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/downloader/universal-utils.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/project/project.resolver.ts(1 hunks)backend/src/user/user.model.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- backend/src/build-system/project-builder.module.ts
- backend/src/chat/chat.module.ts
- backend/src/app.resolver.ts
- backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/datamap/index.ts
- backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts
- backend/src/config/common-path.ts
- backend/src/build-system/handlers/ux/sitemap-structure/index.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- backend/src/auth/role/role.model.ts
- backend/src/auth/dto/check-token.input.ts
- backend/src/user/user.model.ts
- backend/src/project/project.resolver.ts
- backend/src/chat/chat.resolver.ts
- backend/src/build-system/monitor.ts
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- backend/src/downloader/model-downloader.ts
- backend/src/chat/chat.service.ts
- backend/src/downloader/universal-utils.ts
- backend/package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: autofix.ci
backend/.eslintrc.js
[error] 1-1: 'module' is not defined (no-undef)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Run tests and collect coverage
🔇 Additional comments (7)
backend/.eslintrc.js (3)
8-8: LGTM! Plugin addition is well-placed.The addition of the 'unused-imports' plugin aligns with the goal of enhancing linting capabilities for managing unused imports.
25-25: LGTM! Necessary rule disable to avoid conflicts.Disabling '@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars' is correct as it prevents conflicts with the more specialized 'unused-imports' rules that are being added.
33-42: LGTM! Well-structured rules configuration.The rules are well configured with:
- Strict error for unused imports
- Warning for unused variables with appropriate ignore patterns for underscore-prefixed names
backend/src/chat/chat.model.ts (2)
1-2: LGTM! Import statements are now more focused.The consolidation of imports improves code organization and removes unused dependencies.
Line range hint
29-31: LGTM! Appropriate use of simple-json for messages.The column type change to 'simple-json' with a default empty array is a good choice for storing Message arrays, providing both flexibility and a sensible default value.
backend/src/chat/__tests__/chat-isolation.spec.ts (2)
16-25: Well-structured mock implementation!The mock for JwtCacheService is well-documented and covers all essential cache operations with appropriate async behavior.
Line range hint
46-94: Excellent test module configuration!The test setup is comprehensive with:
- In-memory SQLite database for isolation
- Proper dependency injection
- Well-configured mocks
- Disabled logging for clean test output
| /** | ||
| * Test complete chat workflow | ||
| * Validates the entire process from user creation to message handling | ||
| */ | ||
| it('should execute chat workflow', async () => { | ||
| // Step 1: Create test user | ||
| const userData = { | ||
| username: 'testuser', | ||
| password: 'securepassword', | ||
| email: '[email protected]', | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| console.log( | ||
| await chatService.saveMessage( | ||
| chatId, | ||
| 'write me the system prompt', | ||
| MessageRole.User, | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| user = await userResolver.registerUser(userData); | ||
| expect(user).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(user.username).toBe(userData.username); | ||
|
|
||
| const history = await chatService.getChatHistory(chatId); | ||
| const messages = history.map((message) => { | ||
| return { | ||
| role: message.role, | ||
| content: message.content, | ||
| } as MessageInterface; | ||
| // Step 2: Create new chat session | ||
| const chat = await chatService.createChat(user.id, { | ||
| title: 'test chat', | ||
| }); | ||
| console.log(history); | ||
| console.log( | ||
| await modelProvider.chatSync({ | ||
| model: 'gpt-4o', | ||
| messages, | ||
| }), | ||
| expect(chat).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(chat.title).toBe('test chat'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 3: Save user message | ||
| const userMessage = await chatService.saveMessage( | ||
| chat.id, | ||
| 'Hello, this is a test message.', | ||
| MessageRole.User, | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(userMessage).toBeDefined(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 4: Retrieve chat history | ||
| const history = await chatService.getChatHistory(chat.id); | ||
| expect(history).toBeDefined(); | ||
| expect(history).toHaveLength(1); | ||
| expect(history[0].content).toBe('Hello, this is a test message.'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Step 5: Validate message format | ||
| const messages = history.map((message) => ({ | ||
| role: message.role, | ||
| content: message.content, | ||
| })); | ||
| expect(messages).toHaveLength(1); | ||
| expect(messages[0].role).toBe(MessageRole.User); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test coverage with error scenarios.
While the happy path is well-tested, consider adding test cases for:
- Invalid user creation
- Failed chat creation
- Message validation errors
- Database constraints
Example test case structure:
it('should handle invalid chat creation', async () => {
// Attempt to create chat with non-existent user
await expect(
chatService.createChat('invalid-user-id', { title: 'test chat' })
).rejects.toThrow();
});
it('should validate message content', async () => {
// Attempt to save empty message
await expect(
chatService.saveMessage(chat.id, '', MessageRole.User)
).rejects.toThrow();
});
backend/src/auth/auth.service.ts
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why dont we use this.logger
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I used replcae all with Logger.log, lazy to format all the logger for now. Just make sure all log come from same log tool
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we should use logger in here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I already delete the part of downloading of model
Sma1lboy
force-pushed
the
fix-integration-test-and-normal-test
branch
from
8d18ec5 to
dbcb8e4
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary of changes, here are the release notes:
New Features
Dependencies
dotenvandeslint-plugin-unused-importsImprovements
Testing
Chores
These release notes provide a high-level overview of the changes while maintaining confidentiality about specific implementation details.