fix port numebr in back end and add end point configeration to example #96
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/code-generate/index.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses a comprehensive set of changes across multiple files in the backend and frontend repositories. The modifications primarily focus on error handling, WebSocket configuration, environment variable updates, and code structure refinement. Key changes include updating the port configuration, enhancing error management in various handlers, streamlining function calls to Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/README.md (1)
3-7: Improve documentation formatting and clarity.The backend configuration instructions could be clearer and more consistent with markdown formatting:
-// remember to follow this command to configuration the backend endpoint: - -```sh -cp example.env .env -``` +## Backend Configuration + +Copy the example environment file to create your local configuration: + +```bash +cp example.env .env +``` + +This will set up the necessary environment variables, including the GraphQL endpoint configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (4)
backend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonbackend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlfrontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
backend/.env(1 hunks)frontend/README.md(1 hunks)frontend/example.env(1 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/global-loading.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/lib/client.ts(3 hunks)frontend/tsconfig.json(1 hunks)llm-server/src/model/openai-model-provider.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- backend/.env
- frontend/example.env
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: autofix.ci
frontend/tsconfig.json
[error] TypeScript compilation failed. The process exited with code 1, indicating potential type checking errors in the codebase. Run 'tsc' locally to see detailed error messages.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/src/components/global-loading.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Correct usage of 'use client' directive.The addition of 'use client' directive is necessary as this component uses client-side features (useTheme hook).
| const [selectedModel, setSelectedModel] = useState<string>( | ||
| models[0] || 'Loading models' | ||
| ); | ||
| const [selectedModel, setSelectedModel] = useState<string>('gpt-4o'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Restore dynamic model selection instead of hardcoding.
Hardcoding the model to 'gpt-4o' removes flexibility and could cause issues if:
- The model becomes unavailable
- The API returns a different set of models
- The model name changes in the future
Restore the previous dynamic selection:
- const [selectedModel, setSelectedModel] = useState<string>('gpt-4o');
+ const [selectedModel, setSelectedModel] = useState<string>(
+ models?.[0]?.id || 'Loading models...'
+ );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| // WebSocket Link | ||
| wsLink = new GraphQLWsLink( | ||
| createClient({ | ||
| url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GRAPHQL_URL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use WebSocket URL for WebSocket connections.
The WebSocket connection is using the HTTP URL environment variable. This will fail as WebSocket connections require the 'ws://' or 'wss://' protocol.
- url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GRAPHQL_URL,
+ url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GRAPHQL_URL?.replace(/^http/, 'ws'),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GRAPHQL_URL, | |
| url: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_GRAPHQL_URL?.replace(/^http/, 'ws'), |
| @@ -101,7 +97,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| // Create Apollo Client | |||
| const client = new ApolloClient({ | |||
| link: splitLink, | |||
| link: wsLink ? from([httpLink, wsLink]) : httpLink, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect Apollo Client link configuration.
The current configuration bypasses error handling, logging, and authentication middleware by using only httpLink and wsLink.
- link: wsLink ? from([httpLink, wsLink]) : httpLink,
+ link: wsLink ? splitLink : from([errorLink, requestLoggingMiddleware, authMiddleware, httpLink]),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| connectionParams: () => { | ||
| return {}; | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
WebSocket authentication is required - connectionParams must include authorization token
The backend's chat guard expects an authorization token in the WebSocket connection parameters. The current empty implementation will cause authentication failures.
- In
backend/src/guard/chat.guard.ts, the WebSocket context extracts the token fromconnectionParams.authorizationusing Bearer format - Update
connectionParamsto include the authorization token:{ authorization: 'Bearer <token>' }
🔗 Analysis chain
Review empty connectionParams implementation.
The empty connectionParams object might cause authentication issues if the WebSocket connection requires authentication tokens.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if WebSocket authentication is required in the backend
rg -A 5 "subscriptions.*authentication"
Length of output: 41
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WebSocket connection setup patterns
rg -i "websocket.*connection|subscription.*context" -A 5
# Search for auth tokens in connection context
rg -i "(auth.*token|jwt|bearer).*connect" -A 5
# Look for GraphQL subscription setup
ast-grep --pattern 'subscriptions: {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2942
| @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ export class OpenAIModelProvider { | |||
|
|
|||
| async initialize(): Promise<void> { | |||
| this.logger.log('Initializing OpenAI model...'); | |||
|
|
|||
| this.logger.log('Options:', this.options); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider sanitizing sensitive information in logs.
While logging options improves observability, ensure sensitive information like API keys is redacted.
- this.logger.log('Options:', this.options);
+ this.logger.log('Options:', {
+ ...this.options,
+ apiKey: this.options.apiKey ? '[REDACTED]' : undefined,
+ });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| this.logger.log('Options:', this.options); | |
| this.logger.log('Options:', { | |
| ...this.options, | |
| apiKey: this.options.apiKey ? '[REDACTED]' : undefined, | |
| }); |
| @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ | |||
| model: string; | |||
| messages: ChatCompletionMessageParam[]; | |||
| }; | |||
|
|
|||
| this.logger.log(`Processing model (attempt ${model + 1})`); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect string interpolation in model logging.
There's a bug in the model logging where it's concatenating the string with model + 1 instead of using the retries counter.
- this.logger.log(`Processing model (attempt ${model + 1})`);
+ this.logger.log(`Processing model: ${model}`);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
frontend/tsconfig.json
Outdated
| "strict": false, | ||
| "target": "ES2017" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider a gradual approach to strict type checking and update the ECMAScript target
The codebase shows deliberate use of type assertions in specific areas like error handling and testing. While enabling strict mode would improve type safety, it requires a phased approach:
- Update to ES2022 target first (supported by TypeScript 5.6.2)
- Enable strict mode gradually by:
- Start with
strictNullChecks: true - Then
noImplicitAny: true - Finally full
strict: true
- Start with
- "strict": false,
- "target": "ES2017"
+ "target": "ES2022",
+ "strictNullChecks": true,
+ "noImplicitAny": trueKey areas needing attention when enabling strict mode:
- Error handling in model providers
- Auth guards and decorators
- Generic utility functions
- Test mocks and assertions
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider enabling strict type checking and updating the ECMAScript target.
- The
"strict": falsesetting disables important type checks that could help catch bugs early. Consider enabling it to improve code quality and maintainability. - ES2017 target seems outdated given the modern package versions in use. Consider using a more recent target like ES2020 or higher for better performance and features.
- "strict": false,
- "target": "ES2017"
+ "strict": true,
+ "target": "ES2022"The TypeScript compilation failures need to be addressed. Run this script to identify the specific type errors:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find TypeScript errors in the codebase
# Note: This will help identify which files need fixing when strict mode is enabled
# Search for type-related TODOs or FIXMEs
echo "Searching for type-related TODOs..."
rg "TODO.*type|FIXME.*type" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for common type assertion patterns that might need review
echo "Searching for type assertions that might need review..."
rg "as any|as unknown|\!:" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 436
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for type-safety bypasses with correct syntax
echo "Searching for type assertions and bypasses..."
rg "as any|as unknown|!\." -t ts
# Search for explicit any types
echo "Searching for explicit any types..."
rg ": any" -t ts
# Check package.json for TypeScript and browserslist
echo "Checking package.json configuration..."
cat package.json | grep -A 5 '"typescript":\|"browserslist":'
# List all TypeScript files to verify scope
echo "TypeScript files in the project..."
fd -e ts -e tsx
Length of output: 12280
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: autofix.ci
[error] TypeScript compilation failed. The process exited with code 1, indicating potential type checking errors in the codebase. Run 'tsc' locally to see detailed error messages.
frontend/package.json
Outdated
| @@ -40,11 +40,11 @@ | |||
| "graphql": "^16.9.0", | |||
| "graphql-ws": "^5.16.0", | |||
| "lucide-react": "^0.445.0", | |||
| "next": "^14.2.13", | |||
| "next": "^15.1.4", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Revert Next.js and React version upgrades
The codebase is using stable Next.js App Router patterns and modern React features. However, upgrading to Next.js 15 and React 19 poses unnecessary risks:
- React 19 is not officially released yet
- Next.js 15.1.4 is beyond the latest stable version
- ESLint configuration is missing, which is required for Next.js projects
- "next": "^15.1.4",
- "react": "^19.0.0",
- "react-dom": "^19.0.0",
+ "next": "^14.2.13",
+ "react": "^18.3.1",
+ "react-dom": "^18.3.1",
+ "eslint-config-next": "14.2.13"🔗 Analysis chain
Review major version upgrades and dependencies alignment.
Several concerns with the package updates:
- React 19 is not officially released yet. Using an unreleased major version in production could lead to instability.
- The ESLint configuration (
eslint-config-next) version (14.2.13) should be aligned with the Next.js version (15.1.4).
- "next": "^15.1.4",
- "react": "^19.0.0",
- "react-dom": "^19.0.0",
+ "next": "^14.2.13",
+ "react": "^18.3.1",
+ "react-dom": "^18.3.1"Also update the ESLint config if upgrading to Next.js 15:
- "eslint-config-next": "14.2.13",
+ "eslint-config-next": "15.1.4",Let's check for any breaking changes that need to be addressed:
Also applies to: 45-45, 47-47
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in the codebase
# Search for Next.js specific APIs that might have changed in v15
echo "Checking Next.js API usage..."
rg "getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for React features that might be affected
echo "Checking React feature usage..."
rg "useEffect|useState|createContext|memo|forwardRef" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 367
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Next.js and React patterns without file type restrictions
echo "Checking Next.js API usage..."
rg "(getInitialProps|getServerSideProps|getStaticProps|getStaticPaths)"
echo -e "\nChecking App Router vs Pages Router structure..."
fd "page\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$"
fd "layout\.(js|jsx|ts|tsx)$"
echo -e "\nChecking React patterns..."
rg "(useEffect|useState|createContext|memo|forwardRef|'use client'|'use server')"
echo -e "\nChecking package.json for ESLint config..."
cat package.json | grep -A 5 "eslint"
Length of output: 16671
… up logging in OpenAI model provider
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts (1)
Line range hint
21-24: Align error handling with other functions.For consistency, this function should throw
ResponseTagErrorlike other similar functions instead of returning null.} catch (error) { logger.error('Invalid JSON format in the Markdown content: ' + error); - return null; + throw new ResponseTagError('Failed to parse JSON from Markdown content: ' + error); }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts (1)
81-110: Consider adding content validation before file write.Before writing the new content to the file, validate that it's not empty or malformed.
const newContent = formatResponse(response); + if (!newContent?.trim()) { + throw new FileModificationError(`Generated empty content for ${fileName}`); + } + try { await fs.writeFile(filePath, newContent, 'utf-8'); } catch (error) {backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (1)
63-66: Consider separating error logging from error throwing.The current implementation might lose the original error details. Consider logging the error before throwing the new error.
} catch (error: any) { + this.logger.error('Model error:', error); throw new ModelUnavailableError( - "Model didn't respond within the expected time: " + error.stack, + "Model didn't respond within the expected time", + { cause: error } ); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonfrontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yamlpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts(4 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/requirements-document/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/requirements-document/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts(5 hunks)backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts(3 hunks)backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts(3 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- frontend/src/app/(main)/[id]/page.tsx
- frontend/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (5)
backend/src/build-system/utils/strings.ts (1)
60-66: LGTM! Good error handling improvement.The new try-catch block with ResponseTagError provides better error handling and maintains consistency with other parsing functions.
backend/src/build-system/handlers/backend/file-review/file-review.ts (1)
51-53: LGTM! Good error message improvements.The error messages now include the original error details, which will help with debugging.
Also applies to: 85-87
backend/src/build-system/handlers/database/schemas/schemas.ts (1)
18-19: LGTM! Error handling consolidation looks good.The consolidation of multiple error types into
ModelUnavailableErrorandResponseTagErrorimproves error handling consistency.backend/src/build-system/handlers/file-manager/file-arch/index.ts (2)
13-13: LGTM! Error handling consolidation looks good.The consolidation to
ModelUnavailableErroraligns with the changes in other files.
47-47: LGTM! Error message formatting is consistent.The removal of the trailing period in the log message maintains consistency with other log messages.
| error, | ||
| ); | ||
| throw error; // Propagate error to upper-level handler | ||
| throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model Unavailable:' + error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add response validation before usage.
While the error handling has been simplified, we should validate the model's response before using it. An empty or malformed response could cause issues downstream.
} catch (error) {
throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model Unavailable:' + error);
}
+
+ if (!dbRequirementsContent?.trim()) {
+ throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model returned empty response');
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| } catch (error) { | ||
| throw error; | ||
| throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model is unavailable:' + error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add response validation before usage.
Similar to other handlers, we should validate the model's response before using it.
} catch (error) {
throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model is unavailable:' + error);
}
+
+ if (!backendOverview?.trim()) {
+ throw new ModelUnavailableError('Model returned empty response');
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| } | ||
| const newContent = formatResponse(response); | ||
|
|
||
| await fs.writeFile(filePath, newContent, 'utf-8'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for file write operation.
The file write operation should be wrapped in a try-catch block to handle potential write errors.
- await fs.writeFile(filePath, newContent, 'utf-8');
+ try {
+ await fs.writeFile(filePath, newContent, 'utf-8');
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new FileModificationError(`Failed to write to file ${fileName}: ${error}`);
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| try { | ||
| schemaContent = await this.validateDatabaseSchema( | ||
| context, | ||
| schemaContent, | ||
| databaseType, | ||
| ); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| new ResponseTagError('Failed to validate generated schema:' + error); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix error throwing in catch block.
The error is instantiated but not thrown.
try {
schemaContent = await this.validateDatabaseSchema(
context,
schemaContent,
databaseType,
);
} catch (error) {
- new ResponseTagError('Failed to validate generated schema:' + error);
+ throw new ResponseTagError('Failed to validate generated schema:' + error);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| try { | |
| schemaContent = await this.validateDatabaseSchema( | |
| context, | |
| schemaContent, | |
| databaseType, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| new ResponseTagError('Failed to validate generated schema:' + error); | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| schemaContent = await this.validateDatabaseSchema( | |
| context, | |
| schemaContent, | |
| databaseType, | |
| ); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new ResponseTagError('Failed to validate generated schema:' + error); | |
| } |
| @@ -72,14 +71,22 @@ | |||
| databaseType, | |||
| ); | |||
|
|
|||
| const schemaContent = await this.generateDatabaseSchema( | |||
| let schemaContent = await this.generateDatabaseSchema( | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears to be incorrect
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' is not a standard OpenAI model identifier. This appears to be a typo and should be verified with the correct model name from OpenAI's model list.
- The model name is used in multiple files but is not defined in any configuration files or validated by the OpenAI provider
- Consider using a standard OpenAI model name and storing it in a central configuration for consistency
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the model name 'gpt-4o-mini'.
The model name 'gpt-4o-mini' appears to be non-standard. Please verify if this is the correct model identifier.
Additionally, consider extracting the model name to a configuration constant to maintain consistency and ease future updates.
Also applies to: 123-132, 157-157, 165-165, 177-180
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model name usage across the codebase
rg -l "gpt-4o-mini"
# Search for any model configuration files
fd -t f "model.*\.(ts|js|json)$"
Length of output: 1580
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for model configuration or constants
rg -A 5 "gpt-4o-mini" "backend/src/**/*config*" "backend/src/**/*const*" "llm-server/src/**/*config*" "llm-server/src/**/*const*"
# Search in model provider implementations
cat llm-server/src/model/llama-model-provider.ts llm-server/src/model/openai-model-provider.ts
# Check documentation
cat README.md docs/*/README.md 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 14032
…hClocker for improved consistency
… calls for improved clarity and error management
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
Configuration Updates
Frontend Improvements
Backend Enhancements
Development Experience