Skip to content

Issues: StefanKopieczek/gossip

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

16 Open 12 Closed
16 Open 12 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Where is the main function
#44 opened May 24, 2020 by BhekiVilakazi
Missing implementation of Stringer interface for type NoString ?
#42 opened Aug 21, 2018 by notananimal
Interface rewrite
#38 opened Apr 17, 2017 by rynorris
@StefanKopieczek
4
Replies are being sent back from a random source port
#36 opened Feb 6, 2017 by csiwek
@StefanKopieczek
2
Clean up go vet violations and add vet to CI quality
#34 opened Dec 28, 2016 by rynorris
MassUDP test is flaky under load
#31 opened Oct 14, 2016 by StefanKopieczek
We should write some tests based on the RFC 4475 SIP Torture Test messages quality
#24 opened Aug 22, 2015 by rynorris
@StefanKopieczek
Transport tests should be moved to the test package quality
#21 opened Aug 4, 2015 by StefanKopieczek
@StefanKopieczek
transport.Manager.Stop() returns before closing all sockets bug
#20 opened Aug 4, 2015 by StefanKopieczek
@StefanKopieczek
2
Panic in connWatcher when connTable is stopped bug
#13 opened Jul 16, 2015 by StefanKopieczek
@StefanKopieczek
1
Gossip should support the rport parameter in Via headers enhancement
#10 opened Apr 19, 2015 by rynorris
Examples
#7 opened Apr 4, 2015 by johntdyer
@StefanKopieczek
5
Transport layer should be unit tested. quality
#6 opened Nov 10, 2014 by rynorris
@StefanKopieczek
Transaction layer should be unit tested. quality
#5 opened Nov 10, 2014 by rynorris
@rynorris
Transaction layer does not support devices which don't comply with RFC3261 enhancement
#4 opened Nov 10, 2014 by rynorris
@rynorris
Transaction layer does not correlate ACKs to 2xx final responses properly. bug
#2 opened Nov 10, 2014 by rynorris
@rynorris
1
ProTip! Adding no:label will show everything without a label.