Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add passive database checkpoints #2944

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Add passive database checkpoints #2944

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

abraunegg
Copy link
Owner

  • Change performCheckpoint() to accept a string as to what sort of database checkpoint to perform to reduce system I/O
  • Add passive checkpoints at stages when performing certain operations
  • Perform a checkpoint before database shutdown
  • Change database synchronous mode to normal given all the database synchronized(lock) for each operation to reduce system I/O where possible

* Change performCheckpoint() to accept a string as to what sort of database checkpoint to perform to reduce system I/O
* Add passive checkpoints at stages when performing certain operations
* Perform a checkpoint before database shutdown
* Change database synchronous mode to normal given all the database synchronized(lock) for each operation to reduce system I/O where possible
@abraunegg abraunegg added this to the v2.5.3 milestone Nov 1, 2024
src/itemdb.d Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed

This comment has been minimized.

@abraunegg abraunegg merged commit 190bee1 into master Nov 7, 2024
10 checks passed
@abraunegg abraunegg deleted the add-more-db-checkpoints branch November 7, 2024 23:21
@abraunegg
Copy link
Owner Author

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 15, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant