Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ref: update detray to v0.88.0 #841

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

niermann999
Copy link
Contributor

@niermann999 niermann999 commented Feb 4, 2025

Update to the new detray version. I also made sure that the traccc custom scalar type is handed through to detray, so that it will be built in double precision when required.

@niermann999 niermann999 added bug Something isn't working feature New feature or request labels Feb 4, 2025
@@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ message( STATUS "Building Detray as part of the TRACCC project" )

# Declare where to get Detray from.
set( TRACCC_DETRAY_SOURCE
"URL;https://github.com/acts-project/detray/archive/refs/tags/v0.87.0.tar.gz;URL_MD5;0e30107edebfd41fbb3fc1974f665ea9"
"GIT_REPOSITORY;https://github.com/niermann999/detray;GIT_TAG;ref-algebra-detail"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typo?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really. I would like to include that branch in the new detray version

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So it's a draft PR, right...? Because of course we won't merge in this exact code. 🤔 Even a specific hash of your fork would be very iffy. But a branch name is of course absolutely a no-go.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I unmarked the draft, because it would otherwise not trigger the CUDA CI, which is what I am trying to fix on this detray branch

@niermann999 niermann999 marked this pull request as ready for review February 5, 2025 10:51
@niermann999 niermann999 force-pushed the ref-update-detray branch 9 times, most recently from 04d128e to a492f7d Compare February 7, 2025 12:18
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants