Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tagged fields handling #972

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2024
Merged

Fix tagged fields handling #972

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

ods
Copy link
Collaborator

@ods ods commented Jan 30, 2024

Changes

Fix tagged fields handling

  • Use RequestHeader_v1/ResponseHeader_v1 for flexible version
  • Fix DeleteRecords for version 2+

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> (e.g. 588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the PR
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files.

ods added 2 commits January 30, 2024 09:58
* Use RequestHeader_v1/ResponseHeader_v1 for flexible version
* Fix DeleteRecords for version 2+
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e8383ea) 95.04% compared to head (c54f257) 95.12%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #972      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.04%   95.12%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         107      107              
  Lines       16408    16412       +4     
  Branches     2624     2625       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits        15595    15612      +17     
+ Misses        536      522      -14     
- Partials      277      278       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
cext 91.82% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
integration 94.75% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️
purepy 94.58% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
unit 44.91% <37.50%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ods
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ods commented Jan 30, 2024

@vmaurin Could you please review this one and check if it works for your DeleteRecords use cases?

@vmaurin
Copy link
Contributor

vmaurin commented Jan 30, 2024

@ods It looks it does still work. At the moment, it is still not used in production, just tested with a similar use case than the integration test

@ods ods merged commit 9166c96 into aio-libs:master Jan 30, 2024
31 checks passed
@ods ods deleted the fix-tagged-fields branch January 30, 2024 17:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants