converge AIP-161 and AIP-203 update field mask guidance for dealing with output only fields #1249
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jskeet
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2023
andrei-scripniciuc
approved these changes
Oct 19, 2023
itsStrobe
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are inconsistencies between AIP-161 and AIP-203 guidance regarding server handling the presence of output fields in update Field Marks.
In these scenarios, servers should be flexible to allow re-using the same field masks for updates and read. Updating guidance in AIP-161 to reflect that.