Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

implement parse_expected_val_pairs2() #54

Merged

Conversation

SimeonEhrig
Copy link
Member

Same functionality like parse_expected_val_pairs() but much nicer interface. See diff of this PR.

I will not port all tests from parse_expected_val_pairs() to parse_expected_val_pairs2() because it is a big amount work. The function should be used for new tests and if tests will be overworked.

- same functionality like parse_expected_val_pairs() but much nicer interface
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.14%. Comparing base (abca5d6) to head (330c689).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #54   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.14%   95.14%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines         700      701    +1     
  Branches      213      213           
=======================================
+ Hits          666      667    +1     
  Misses         15       15           
  Partials       19       19           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@SimeonEhrig SimeonEhrig merged commit 883bc22 into alpaka-group:main Oct 9, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants