Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update gh build workflow to use pnpm #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024
Merged

feat: update gh build workflow to use pnpm #25

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2024

Conversation

andostronaut
Copy link
Owner

@andostronaut andostronaut commented Aug 11, 2024

This is an automated pull request for branch develop

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Streamlined the build process by replacing Bun with PNPM for dependency management.
    • Simplified caching mechanism to utilize PNPM's cache.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The update focuses on streamlining the build process by transitioning from Bun to PNPM for dependency management. Key changes include the removal of Bun-specific setup steps, the introduction of PNPM configuration, and a simplified caching mechanism. This change enhances efficiency and focuses solely on using PNPM to manage packages, improving the overall workflow in GitHub Actions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yaml Removed Bun version specification and setup; introduced PNPM setup and installation commands; simplified caching using PNPM.

Poem

In the garden, hops a rabbit bright,
With PNPM now, oh what a delight!
Bun has gone, like shadows at noon,
Dependencies dance, a joyful tune.
With every install, the flowers bloom! 🌼🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 49c2e3e and 3521706.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/build.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/build.yaml (3)

16-19: PNPM setup looks good.

The setup of pnpm with version 8 and run_install: false is correctly configured to allow explicit control over the installation process.


21-23: Node.js setup with PNPM cache looks good.

The Node.js setup with version matrix and cache set to 'pnpm' is correctly aligned with the use of pnpm for package management.


24-24: Explicit PNPM installation step looks good.

Running pnpm install explicitly ensures that dependencies are installed according to the pnpm configuration.

@andostronaut andostronaut merged commit b621bd3 into main Aug 11, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant