We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As per conversation with @jaydiablo here, I'd like to review the performance of the 3.x series.
3.x
Although we have significantly reduced the memory usage in 3.x, it now takes much longer to process.
@jaydiablo has pinpointed a potential big win:
This was the biggest win for me when I was trying to optimize crossjoin: https://github.com/crossjoin/Browscap/commit/2ee9663bd4b971c658d87f33fe780858580f7bd4 (the digit replacement in that commit is a bit overzealous, and causes tests to fail, which was fixed later https://github.com/crossjoin/Browscap/commit/afd9f8eaec3fe506ed864a93a536e2370b570922)
Investigate this and see if we can optimise similarly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The changes from crossjoin/Browscap@2ee9663 were reimplemented in the optimize branch and merged at the 26.09.
crossjoin/Browscap@2ee9663
Sorry, something went wrong.
mimmi20
No branches or pull requests
As per conversation with @jaydiablo here, I'd like to review the performance of the
3.x
series.Although we have significantly reduced the memory usage in
3.x
, it now takes much longer to process.@jaydiablo has pinpointed a potential big win:
Investigate this and see if we can optimise similarly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: