Add contrib provider ce-oem GitHub workflow (Infra) #938
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pieqq
changed the title
pieqq
changed the title
pieqq
force-pushed
the
add-contrib-provider-ce-oem-workflow
branch
2 times, most recently
from
a58d8a1 to
30ead3a
Compare
This workflow comes from the original Git repository and is no longer needed.
This workflow is adapted from existing workflows used for the generic providers.
- Point to the correct version of Python using {envpython}
- Remove the "develop installation" step for the ce-oem provider
- Convert the test step into a test coverage one to generate an XML
report to be used later by Codecov
Following Codecov documentation on flags[1], use the `contrib-provider-ce-oem` flag defined in the GitHub workflow[2] to mark Codecov status checks as non-blocking[3]. [1] https://docs.codecov.com/docs/flags [2] .github/workflows/tox-contrib-provider-ce-oem.yaml [3] https://docs.codecov.com/docs/common-recipe-list#set-non-blocking-status-checks
pieqq
force-pushed
the
add-contrib-provider-ce-oem-workflow
branch
from
ade379a to
3638a5b
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #938 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 38.98% 37.87% -1.12%
==========================================
Files 315 333 +18
Lines 34893 36913 +2020
Branches 5971 6301 +330
==========================================
+ Hits 13604 13981 +377
- Misses 20678 22312 +1634
- Partials 611 620 +9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
LiaoU3
pushed a commit
to LiaoU3/checkbox
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
* Remove old ce-oem workflow
This workflow comes from the original Git repository and is no longer
needed.
* Add workflow for the ce-oem provider
This workflow is adapted from existing workflows used for the generic
providers.
* Update contrib ce-oem tox config
- Point to the correct version of Python using {envpython}
- Remove the "develop installation" step for the ce-oem provider
- Convert the test step into a test coverage one to generate an XML
report to be used later by Codecov
* Point to the right directory for generic providers
* Install ce-oem provider prior to run validation on it
* Add codecov config for ce-oem contrib provider
Following Codecov documentation on flags[1], use the
`contrib-provider-ce-oem` flag defined in the GitHub workflow[2] to mark
Codecov status checks as non-blocking[3].
[1] https://docs.codecov.com/docs/flags
[2] .github/workflows/tox-contrib-provider-ce-oem.yaml
[3]
https://docs.codecov.com/docs/common-recipe-list#set-non-blocking-status-checks
* Fix tox configuration for ce-oem provider
* Add coverage requirement to ce-oem tox config
* Add coverage config to ce-oem provider
* Update codecov config to make project status non-blocking for ce-oem provider
* Change job id and add a name to it for easier reference
binli
pushed a commit
to binli/checkbox
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
* Remove old ce-oem workflow
This workflow comes from the original Git repository and is no longer
needed.
* Add workflow for the ce-oem provider
This workflow is adapted from existing workflows used for the generic
providers.
* Update contrib ce-oem tox config
- Point to the correct version of Python using {envpython}
- Remove the "develop installation" step for the ce-oem provider
- Convert the test step into a test coverage one to generate an XML
report to be used later by Codecov
* Point to the right directory for generic providers
* Install ce-oem provider prior to run validation on it
* Add codecov config for ce-oem contrib provider
Following Codecov documentation on flags[1], use the
`contrib-provider-ce-oem` flag defined in the GitHub workflow[2] to mark
Codecov status checks as non-blocking[3].
[1] https://docs.codecov.com/docs/flags
[2] .github/workflows/tox-contrib-provider-ce-oem.yaml
[3]
https://docs.codecov.com/docs/common-recipe-list#set-non-blocking-status-checks
* Fix tox configuration for ce-oem provider
* Add coverage requirement to ce-oem tox config
* Add coverage config to ce-oem provider
* Update codecov config to make project status non-blocking for ce-oem provider
* Change job id and add a name to it for easier reference
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Resolved issues
CHECKBOX-1157
Documentation
Tests
Used Codecov validation to check the codecov.yml file was valid: