Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adds the envoy rock #3

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Adds the envoy rock #3

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

claudiubelu
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the original PR: #1

Adds the envoy rock.

Switches amd64 runner with a self-hosted one. There are some issues when trying to use the github runners for building the envoy rock, specifically when it comes to building and linking the envoy binary. The Runner can lose communication with the server due to CPU / Memory starvation, causing the runner to be terminated.

The self-hosted runners are bigger, so the compilation time should be significantly smaller, and it shouldn't end up in resource starvation.

Copy link
Contributor

@bschimke95 bschimke95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks good, please rebase as I merged #2

1.28.2/rockcraft.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
1.28.2/rockcraft.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Maciej Golaszewski and others added 3 commits July 30, 2024 15:29
Trims whitespaces.

Adds quiet option to wget, which polluted the output logs.

Replaced bazel.sizeopt.server_only with sizeopt.server_only, the bazel.
prefix is deprecated.

Removes ENVOY_DOCKER_BUILD_DIR, that only applies for docker-based image
building.
There are some issues when trying to use the github runners for
building the envoy rock, specifically when it comes to building
and linking the envoy binary. The Runner can lose communication
with the server due to CPU / Memory starvation, causing the runner
to be terminated.

The self-hosted runners are bigger, so the compilation time should
be significantly smaller, and it shouldn't end up in resource starvation.
@claudiubelu claudiubelu requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2024 05:39
Copy link
Contributor

@bschimke95 bschimke95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, great work

@bschimke95 bschimke95 merged commit c74fb73 into canonical:main Jul 31, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
@bschimke95 bschimke95 mentioned this pull request Jul 31, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants