-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 346
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add additonal validity checks during process proposal #1128
Closed
rahulghangas
wants to merge
4
commits into
celestiaorg:main
from
rahulghangas:feat/pfb-validity-checks
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7b53588
feat: add additonal validity checks during process proposal
rahulghangas 2eb7534
chore: do basic validation on tx once if it includes MsgPayForBlob
rahulghangas 924156a
feat: do all validation for execution and gas usage through check tra…
rahulghangas 4c4608a
Merge branch 'main' into feat/pfb-validity-checks
rahulghangas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -79,10 +79,16 @@ func (app *App) ProcessProposal(req abci.RequestProcessProposal) abci.ResponsePr | |
|
||
tx, err := app.txConfig.TxDecoder()(malleatedTx.Tx) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
// we don't reject the block here because it is not a block validity | ||
// rule that all transactions included in the block data are | ||
// decodable | ||
continue | ||
return abci.ResponseProcessProposal{ | ||
Result: abci.ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
err = tx.ValidateBasic() | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return abci.ResponseProcessProposal{ | ||
Result: abci.ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
for _, msg := range tx.GetMsgs() { | ||
|
@@ -103,6 +109,27 @@ func (app *App) ProcessProposal(req abci.RequestProcessProposal) abci.ResponsePr | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
signers := msg.GetSigners() | ||
if len(signers) != 1 { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. why are we rejecting txs that have more than one signer? |
||
logInvalidPropBlockError(app.Logger(), req.Header, "cannot have multiple signers for MsgPayForBlob", err) | ||
return abci.ResponseProcessProposal{ | ||
Result: abci.ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
signer, err := sdk.AccAddressFromBech32(pfb.Signer) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
// this panic should be unreachable | ||
panic("signer address validation should not fail after basic validation has already been done") | ||
} | ||
|
||
if !bytes.Equal(signer, signers[0]) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. why are we checking the signer here? |
||
logInvalidPropBlockError(app.Logger(), req.Header, "invalid signer for MsgPayForBlob", err) | ||
return abci.ResponseProcessProposal{ | ||
Result: abci.ResponseProcessProposal_REJECT, | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
commitment, err := inclusion.GetCommit(cacher, dah, int(malleatedTx.ShareIndex), shares.BlobSharesUsed(int(pfb.BlobSize))) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
logInvalidPropBlockError(app.Logger(), req.Header, "commitment not found", err) | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
still thinking about this 🤔 but its probably the correct move. All transactions with an index wrapped around them must be decodable