[IMP] cetmix_tower_server: Access rules #194
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces security enhancements for the Cetmix Tower Server Management application. Key changes include the addition of a new security XML file, an extension of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_command.py (1)
Line range hint
514-614: Consider breaking down the test into smaller, focused test methods.While the test provides comprehensive coverage of access rules, it would be more maintainable if split into separate test methods for each scenario (e.g., default access, group membership, follower access).
Consider refactoring like this:
- def test_user_access_rule(self): - """Test user access rule""" + def test_default_command_access_level(self): + """Test default access level and basic user access""" + test_command = self.Command.create({"name": "Test command"}) + self.assertEqual(test_command.access_level, "2") + # ... rest of default access testing + + def test_group_membership_access(self): + """Test how group membership affects command access""" + test_command = self.Command.create({"name": "Test command"}) + # ... group membership testing + + def test_follower_access_rules(self): + """Test server follower access rules""" + test_command = self.Command.create({"name": "Test command"}) + # ... follower access testingcetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml (1)
4-21: Consider specifying CRUD permissions explicitly.While default permissions can be relied upon as per the retrieved learning, it's a good practice to explicitly define the intended permissions for clarity and maintainability.
Example:
<record id="cx_tower_key_rule_group_manager_access" model="ir.rule"> <field name="name">Tower Key: manager access rule</field> <field name="model_id" ref="model_cx_tower_key" /> + <field name="perm_read" eval="True"/> + <field name="perm_write" eval="True"/> + <field name="perm_create" eval="True"/> + <field name="perm_unlink" eval="True"/> ... </record>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cetmix_tower_server/security/ir.model.access.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
cetmix_tower_server/__manifest__.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/__init__.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/res_partner.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_command.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_key.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- cetmix_tower_server/models/init.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml (2)
Learnt from: Aldeigja
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#98
File: cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_variable_value_security.xml:99-117
Timestamp: 2024-11-28T20:05:47.614Z
Learning: In Odoo's security model, group rules unify, meaning that access is granted if any rule allows it. Therefore, when a subscription check is already included in a prior rule, subsequent rules can focus solely on other conditions like `create_uid` without duplicating the subscription check.
In `cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_variable_value_security.xml`, when defining access rules for managers deleting their own variable values in server templates, it's sufficient to check `create_uid` if the subscription to the server template has been validated in a previous rule.
Learnt from: Aldeigja
PR: cetmix/cetmix-tower#98
File: cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_plan_line_security.xml:38-50
Timestamp: 2024-11-20T22:04:20.044Z
Learning: In `cetmix_tower_server/security/*.xml` files, when defining access control rules for Odoo models, if the intention is to grant full permissions (read, create, write, unlink) within the domain specified, it is acceptable to omit the `perm_*` fields and rely on default permission values.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test with OCB
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cetmix_tower_server/models/res_partner.py (1)
11-15: LGTM! Well-structured field definition.The One2many field is properly defined with clear naming and correct relationship parameters.
cetmix_tower_server/__manifest__.py (1)
28-28: LGTM! Security file properly declared.The security file is added in the correct section, maintaining consistency with other security declarations.
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_key.py (1)
45-47: LGTM! Clear and focused security test.The test properly verifies access control by asserting the AccessError is raised when attempting unauthorized access.
cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml (2)
11-12: Review the permissive condition for unassigned servers.The current domain allows access to records where both
server_idandserver_ssh_idsareFalse. This might be too permissive as it grants access to orphaned or unassigned keys.Consider if this is intentional or if additional conditions should be added to restrict access to unassigned keys.
27-27: Verify the group reference exists.The rule references
cetmix_tower_server.group_root. Please ensure this group is properly defined in the module's security files.✅ Verification successful
Group reference verification successful
The
group_rootis properly defined incetmix_tower_server/security/cetmix_tower_server_groups.xml, ensuring the security rule's group reference is valid.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the group_root definition exists # Search for group_root definition in security files rg -l "id=\"group_root\"" "cetmix_tower_server/security/"Length of output: 115
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have added new access rules. This means you must add access rules to check those new rules to ensure they are working properly.
There must be test for:
- Keys. Ensure that access rules are respected.
- Commands: Ensure that new rules don't break the command flow.
User may not have access to a secret, but if he runs a command this secret still needed to be rendered properly.
Eg If someone with the "User" access lever runs a Flight Plan and there is a command that has a secret in it, all 3 steps of the secret resolution must pass:
- Server secret
- Partner secret
- Global secret
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have added new access rules. This means you must add access rules to check those new rules to ensure they are working properly.
GabbasovDinar
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4300-cetmix_tower_server
branch
from
ddf1ed4 to
3da1941
Compare
Added new security rules for tower key management Task: 4300
GabbasovDinar
force-pushed
the
14.0-t4300-cetmix_tower_server
branch
from
3da1941 to
4203086
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_command.py (3)
514-514: Consider splitting this test method into smaller, focused test cases.The
test_user_access_rulemethod covers multiple test scenarios. Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused test methods for better maintainability and readability:
test_default_command_access_leveltest_user_group_permissionstest_access_level_modificationstest_command_visibilitytest_follower_access_rules
Line range hint
523-532: Consider enhancing assertion messages.While the test logic is correct, the assertion messages could be more descriptive:
-self.assertEqual(test_command.access_level, "2") +self.assertEqual(test_command.access_level, "2", "Default command access level should be 2") with self.assertRaises(AccessError): - command_name = test_command_1_as_bob.name + command_name = test_command_1_as_bob.name # noqa: F841 + self.fail("User without proper group access should not be able to read command name")
Line range hint
549-558: Consider using parameterized tests for access level checks.This section tests access level modifications. Consider using parameterized tests to make it more maintainable:
@parameterized.expand([ ("1", "2", True), # (initial_level, target_level, should_succeed) ("2", "3", False), ]) def test_access_level_modification(self, initial_level, target_level, should_succeed): command = self.Command.with_user(self.user_bob).create( {"name": "Test Command", "access_level": initial_level} ) if should_succeed: command.write({"access_level": target_level}) self.assertEqual(command.access_level, target_level) else: with self.assertRaises(AccessError): command.write({"access_level": target_level})cetmix_tower_server/static/description/index.html (3)
472-472: Consider using relative paths for image references.The documentation uses absolute GitHub raw content URLs for images. This tightly couples the documentation to a specific GitHub repository and branch. Consider using relative paths instead for better maintainability.
Example change for one of the image references:
-<img alt="User profile" src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cetmix/cetmix-tower/14.0/cetmix_tower_server/static/description/images/user_profile.png" /> +<img alt="User profile" src="images/user_profile.png" />Also applies to: 1029-1029, 1166-1166, 1264-1264, 1271-1271
1201-1206: Improve clarity of path variable limitations.The documentation about path variables could be clearer about the limitations and security implications.
Apply this diff to improve the clarity:
-<li><strong>Path</strong>: Directory where command will be executed. Important: this -field does not support variables! Ensure that user has access to -this location even if you run command using sudo.</li> +<li><strong>Path</strong>: Directory where command will be executed. +<strong>Important security note</strong>: +- This field does not support variable substitution +- Ensure the executing user has appropriate filesystem permissions for this path +- Access rights must be verified even when using sudo execution +</li>
1220-1222: Improve formatting of validation error warning.The warning about validation errors could be formatted better for emphasis and clarity.
Apply this diff to improve the formatting:
-<strong>IMPORTANT:</strong> Button will be show only if single server is selected. If you try to run a command for several servers from code, you will get a ValidationError. +<strong>IMPORTANT:</strong> +- Button will only be shown when a single server is selected +- Attempting to run a command for multiple servers via code will raise a ValidationError
🛑 Comments failed to post (2)
cetmix_tower_server/static/description/index.html (2)
1129-1130:
⚠️ Potential issueFix broken relative links in documentation.
The documentation contains broken relative links to CONFIGURE.md which don't exist in the current context.
Apply this diff to fix the links:
-<a class="reference external" href="CONFIGURE.md/#configure-a-server-template">Server Template</a> +<a class="reference external" href="#configure-a-server-template">Server Template</a> -<a class="reference external" href="CONFIGURE.md/#configure-a-flight-plan">Flight Plan</a> +<a class="reference external" href="#configure-a-flight-plan">Flight Plan</a>Also applies to: 1137-1138
372-372:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Replace plaintext HTTP URLs with HTTPS.
The documentation contains insecure plaintext HTTP URLs that should be updated to use HTTPS for better security.
Apply this diff to fix the HTTP URL:
-<a class="reference external" href="http://cetmix.com/tower">Cetmix Tower</a> +<a class="reference external" href="https://cetmix.com/tower">Cetmix Tower</a>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 ast-grep (0.31.1)
[warning] 372-372: "This link points to a plaintext HTTP URL. Prefer an encrypted HTTPS URL if possible."
Context: Cetmix Tower
Note: [CWE-319] Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness [REFERENCES]
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html(plaintext-http-link-html)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_command.py (5)
514-514: Consider splitting the test method into smaller, focused test cases.The test method covers multiple scenarios and is quite long. Consider breaking it down into separate test methods for better maintainability and readability:
test_user_access_rule_default_access_leveltest_user_access_rule_group_permissionstest_user_access_rule_manager_accesstest_user_access_rule_root_accesstest_user_access_rule_follower_access
Line range hint
516-524: Consider moving test data setup to setUp method.The test command creation and initial assertions could be moved to the setUp method since they're used across multiple test cases. This would improve test maintainability and reduce code duplication.
def setUp(self, *args, **kwargs): super().setUp(*args, **kwargs) + # Create the test command + self.test_command = self.Command.create({"name": "Test command"}) + # Ensure that default command access_level is equal to 2 + self.assertEqual(self.test_command.access_level, "2")
Line range hint
525-533: Add assertions for group membership state.After removing the user from groups, add assertions to verify the user's group membership state. This helps ensure the test's preconditions are met.
# Remove bob from all cxtower_server groups self.remove_from_group( self.user_bob, [ "cetmix_tower_server.group_user", "cetmix_tower_server.group_manager", "cetmix_tower_server.group_root", ], ) +# Verify user is not in any groups +self.assertFalse(self.user_bob.has_group('cetmix_tower_server.group_user')) +self.assertFalse(self.user_bob.has_group('cetmix_tower_server.group_manager')) +self.assertFalse(self.user_bob.has_group('cetmix_tower_server.group_root'))
Line range hint
534-540: Enhance error message in AccessError test.When testing for AccessError, include a more descriptive assertion message that explains the expected behavior.
# Ensure that regular user cannot access the command test_command_1_as_bob = test_command.with_user(self.user_bob) with self.assertRaises(AccessError): - command_name = test_command_1_as_bob.name + command_name = test_command_1_as_bob.name, "User without proper group access should not be able to read command name"
Line range hint
591-607: Add test cases for edge cases in access level changes.The test could benefit from additional edge cases when testing access level changes:
- Attempting to set an invalid access level
- Attempting to set the same access level
- Testing access level changes with different user types
# Try to demote the access_level of new_command to 2 restricted_command.with_user(self.user_bob).write({"access_level": "2"}) self.assertEqual(restricted_command.access_level, "2") + +# Test edge cases for access level changes +with self.assertRaises(ValueError): + restricted_command.with_user(self.user_bob).write({"access_level": "4"}) + +# Test setting same access level +restricted_command.with_user(self.user_bob).write({"access_level": "2"}) +self.assertEqual(restricted_command.access_level, "2")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
cetmix_tower_server/security/ir.model.access.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
cetmix_tower_server/README.rst(25 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/__manifest__.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/__init__.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/models/res_partner.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/static/description/index.html(28 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_command.py(1 hunks)cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_key.py(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- cetmix_tower_server/models/init.py
- cetmix_tower_server/manifest.py
- cetmix_tower_server/models/res_partner.py
- cetmix_tower_server/tests/test_key.py
- cetmix_tower_server/README.rst
- cetmix_tower_server/security/cx_tower_key_security.xml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 ast-grep (0.31.1)
cetmix_tower_server/static/description/index.html
[warning] 372-372: "This link points to a plaintext HTTP URL. Prefer an encrypted HTTPS URL if possible."
Context: Cetmix Tower
Note: [CWE-319] Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness [REFERENCES]
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html
(plaintext-http-link-html)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
cetmix_tower_server/static/description/index.html (3)
472-472: LGTM! Image references are properly configured.The image references are correctly structured:
- Use HTTPS for secure content delivery
- Paths match the module version
- Use raw.githubusercontent.com domain for direct access
Also applies to: 1029-1029, 1166-1166, 1264-1264, 1271-1271
Line range hint
1-1301: LGTM! Documentation is well-structured and comprehensive.The documentation:
- Has clear sections for configuration, usage, and best practices
- Includes properly formatted code examples
- Provides detailed explanations for each feature
Line range hint
1-24: LGTM! HTML structure follows best practices.The HTML document:
- Uses proper DOCTYPE declaration
- Has well-organized head section
- Contains properly scoped CSS
🧰 Tools
🪛 ast-grep (0.31.1)
[warning] 371-371: "This link points to a plaintext HTTP URL. Prefer an encrypted HTTPS URL if possible."
Context:
Note: [CWE-319] Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness [REFERENCES]
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html(plaintext-http-link-html)
[warning] 372-372: "This link points to a plaintext HTTP URL. Prefer an encrypted HTTPS URL if possible."
Context: Cetmix Tower
Note: [CWE-319] Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness [REFERENCES]
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html(plaintext-http-link-html)
| @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ <h1 class="title">Cetmix Tower Server Management</h1> | |||
| !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |||
| !! source digest: sha256:a909c11c3ba7b317d8007cb9af81831a163de51422ca457789e0f02f6abcf3c3 | |||
| !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --> | |||
| <p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://odoo-community.org/page/development-status"><img alt="Beta" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Beta-yellow.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html"><img alt="License: AGPL-3" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://github.com/cetmix/cetmix-tower/tree/14.0-dev/cetmix_tower_server"><img alt="cetmix/cetmix-tower" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/github-cetmix%2Fcetmix--tower-lightgray.png?logo=github" /></a></p> | |||
| <p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://odoo-community.org/page/development-status"><img alt="Beta" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/maturity-Beta-yellow.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0-standalone.html"><img alt="License: AGPL-3" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/licence-AGPL--3-blue.png" /></a> <a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://github.com/cetmix/cetmix-tower/tree/14.0/cetmix_tower_server"><img alt="cetmix/cetmix-tower" src="https://img.shields.io/badge/github-cetmix%2Fcetmix--tower-lightgray.png?logo=github" /></a></p> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Replace HTTP URLs with HTTPS.
The documentation contains plaintext HTTP URLs which could pose security risks. These should be updated to use HTTPS.
Apply this diff to fix the security issue:
-<p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="http://cetmix.com/tower">
+<p><a class="reference external image-reference" href="https://cetmix.com/tower">
-<a class="reference external" href="http://cetmix.com/tower">Cetmix Tower</a>
+<a class="reference external" href="https://cetmix.com/tower">Cetmix Tower</a>Also applies to: 413-413
🧰 Tools
🪛 ast-grep (0.31.1)
[warning] 372-372: "This link points to a plaintext HTTP URL. Prefer an encrypted HTTPS URL if possible."
Context: Cetmix Tower
Note: [CWE-319] Authentication Bypass by Primary Weakness [REFERENCES]
- https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/319.html
(plaintext-http-link-html)
Added new security rules for tower key management
Task: 4300
Summary by CodeRabbit
Security Enhancements
cx_tower_keymodel based on user groups and permissions.Data Model Updates
server_idsfield to link partners with servers.Testing Improvements
Documentation Updates